MM@! :
雖然客運被柴鍥爾夫人打壓，不過用嚟運貨，火車到今日仍然有壓倒性優勢
BR因ECML電化，順道學日本／德國啤埋高速（客）貨物機車 Class 91 Electra；要求日間拉客、晚上拉貨，每日到Preventive Maint前，至小可以行車21小時，可能好啱香港要嚟用KTT![[sosad]](https://www.hkbf.org/images/smilies/icon_sosad.gif "So Sad")
（wn.com/dcc_sound）
Electra 91另一個主要目的，就係provide Intercity 225嘅loco，咁但係車快無用，因為依家High Speed Train已經係勉強睇到lineside signal postjko126 :In the event of an overspeed on approach to a signal at danger or a SPAD, TPWS should stop the train before the conflict point (e.g junction, crossing...etc).
Although TPWS is a kind of speed-check device like "速度照査" in Japan in conjunction with their ATS （Automatic Train Stop）system, they can't prevent derailment cause by overspeed when trains are switching lines.
In case a semi fast train is going to a station platform at slow line from fast line, the driver can still approach the point with excessive speed and then SPAD.
This semi fast service will first SPAD then derail and the other train would crash on it shortly after that.
Futhermore, depends on the setup, TPWS could not provide full length overlap in Britain. However it can in Australia.
Freight trains would not able to stop in time even though TPWS has tripped the train. Most of SPAD cases on mainline, the train involved would have to slip into overlap block. I would say TPWS could prevent or eliminate 70% of accident and the other 30 you need a ATP system.jko126 :I heard somewhere that TPWS was installed in India
I am reading a presentation by Ansaldo STS
It seems that the TPWS-S／N system installed for railways of Chennai and Delhi is actually a ETCS level 1 solution with in cab signaling like TBL2 on KCR East Rail（Now：East Rail Line）
http://irse2010.in/october26/TPWSinIndia-IRSESeminar.pdf
Referring to the document, the driver need not to observe lineside signals and he will eventually get his LOMA and taret speed via cab display with signal posts retained for non-comm trains. That what exactly we're doing on East Rail Line.
However the trains／trackside equipment are not communicating though GSM-R and LOMA will only be updated via every single point so it could not fulfill the requirement of ETCS2 then it classified itself as ETCS1 instead
所以當時架class 91諗住喺ECML行140 mph，仲要用閃下閃下嘅綠燈去表示架車可以行140 mph
結果就當然係無人睇到支燈係咩aspect，仲要將架車落返去125 mph，就好似東鐵啲千九咁 : 得物無所用，英雄無用武之地
仲搞笑嘅係當年預想架class 93行155 mph，衰啲講句 : 痴心妄想
正所謂有好野就要齊齊分享，我地睇下格離版又有咩笑話提供
「在九十年代私有化前夕，英國鐵路經歷最黑暗日子
設備殘舊，服務欠佳，在九十年代才開始著手搞ATP，但歐洲大陸己全面進入自動化年代
連首都倫敦的通勤火車也要用上像豬籠車一般，動軏四五十年車齡的EMU，
不但沒有空調等現在的基本設備，連自動車門也欠奉，
即係話火車車門好似普通屋企房門咁，隨時可以在行車中打開」
首先，「設備殘舊，服務欠佳」就唔係BR自己一手造成嘅，要多謝嘅就多謝帶灼耳夫人啦
第二，「九十年代才開始著手搞ATP」
東鐵都係90年代先引入TBL，所以唔好五十步笑百步
第三，「歐洲大陸己全面進入自動化年代」
咩叫全面進入自動化?? ARS?? ATO?? FAO?? UTO?? 其實佢想咩呢，係無人知嘅
第四，「首都倫敦的通勤火車也要用上像豬籠車一般，動軏四五十年車齡的EMU」
咁啲Networker係咩黎??
其他我就等大家繼續講落去啦
![[banghead]](https://www.hkbf.org/images/smilies/icon_banghead.gif "我撞牆死左佢算啦！"){kind=icon}
，但AWS係唔會話你知前面係咩黃定紅色）
(the southern railway) 
(@Mountainranger74, Flickr)
![[photo]](https://www.hkbf.org/images/smilies/Photo.gif "傾偈無圖無偈傾")
（GBrailwayworld.uk）
(Wikipedia)
(Wikipedia)
![[flowerface]](https://www.hkbf.org/images/smilies/flower.gif "丁香丹桂茉莉 都覺得可愛")
