Waihorace :[ 圖檔 ]
龜龜唔係想開27 tph咩...

l_arco :

Waihorace :[ 圖檔 ]
龜龜唔係想開27 tph咩...

龜鐵對外向人講D野信得過架咩?
龜鐵由三年前到而家夠話EWL行八卡啦，不過呢紙就包唔住火既

toyota :

隱藏文字

---

本部份只供會員瀏覽

MM@! :

l_arco :

Waihorace :[ 圖檔 ]
龜龜唔係想開27 tph咩...

龜鐵對外向人講D野信得過架咩?
龜鐵由三年前到而家夠話EWL行八卡啦，不過呢紙就包唔住火既

自7月3號之後，東鐵係開緊24tph，即係有288卡運力，照佢所講
除非如我一直所講，佢有辦法shift啲新界南去紅磡、尖沙咀嘅客走，咁南北綫先有望負荷正常化

當然，啲客就唔係傻嘅，沙田去紅磡點解唔坐南北綫?
除非啦WOO，NSL逼到升天，再加上開EWL果期啲客因為無直接車去紅磡
所以就會養成轉車習慣

hello :

miklcct :

MM@! :KTT is an example how does KCRC Gauge accept a double decker train on the main line. The remaining problem is traction, dwell time and queue arrangement. Remember you''ll need to handle 2 times of passengers with the same amount of dwell time

Isn't increasing the dwell time a solution? The ideas I have for a double-decker train are:

• Each car has two wide doors: an entrance and an exit
• Each car has two staircases: one for going up and one for going down
• The lower deck is standing only, while the upper deck is seating only

Under these ideas, boarding and alighting passengers would not clash each other, and passengers would be willing to go to the inside of the compartment as they would need to pass though it to exit the train. I think some of the above have already been implemented somewhere in the world.

Do you know the chain effect if we increase the dwell time of each trains at each stations??
Do you think the passengers are willing to stand in the first class?? Even in the lower deck??
If they want to stand, why don't they just take the standard class??
Have you ever consider the problem of headroom while standing in the lower deck or upper deck in first class??
If you take a reference of the Tokyo Metro 05 series train introduce the wide door in the past few years, you will know the adoption of wide door is a failure.
The conclusion is:
It is not possible to adopt extra-wide door and double decker in the first class of the new NSL trains.

93A_S3~* :

hello :

miklcct :

MM@! :KTT is an example how does KCRC Gauge accept a double decker train on the main line. The remaining problem is traction, dwell time and queue arrangement. Remember you''ll need to handle 2 times of passengers with the same amount of dwell time

Isn't increasing the dwell time a solution? The ideas I have for a double-decker train are:

• Each car has two wide doors: an entrance and an exit
• Each car has two staircases: one for going up and one for going down
• The lower deck is standing only, while the upper deck is seating only

Under these ideas, boarding and alighting passengers would not clash each other, and passengers would be willing to go to the inside of the compartment as they would need to pass though it to exit the train. I think some of the above have already been implemented somewhere in the world.

Do you know the chain effect if we increase the dwell time of each trains at each stations??
Do you think the passengers are willing to stand in the first class?? Even in the lower deck??
If they want to stand, why don't they just take the standard class??
Have you ever consider the problem of headroom while standing in the lower deck or upper deck in first class??
If you take a reference of the Tokyo Metro 05 series train introduce the wide door in the past few years, you will know the adoption of wide door is a failure.
The conclusion is:
It is not possible to adopt extra-wide door and double decker in the first class of the new NSL trains.

小小離題，
其實05系個case唔可以算係完全fail，
而家佢的後繼車15000系都承襲左佢的闊門設計，雖然唔及05闊

l_arco :

Waihorace :[ 圖檔 ]
龜龜唔係想開27 tph咩...

龜鐵對外向人講D野信得過架咩?
龜鐵由三年前到而家夠話EWL行八卡啦，不過呢紙就包唔住火既

hello :你知唔知闊門車有個問題就係少左位坐??
少左位坐果架車係邊架?? 就係你口中果架15000系呀大哥

你估無人諗過NSL用6門車咩?? 最大問題就係無位坐呀嘛哥哥
呢度有班先輩已經諗過呢個問題啦，但全部都係比「無位坐」呢個point否決左，所以你都唔洗諗落去

成條NSL由羅湖企去中環真係你企埋我果份，句號

miklcct :

l_arco :

Waihorace :[ 圖檔 ]
龜龜唔係想開27 tph咩...

龜鐵對外向人講D野信得過架咩?
龜鐵由三年前到而家夠話EWL行八卡啦，不過呢紙就包唔住火既

難道你不知道EWL最終會行八卡嗎？！只是通車初期暫時行七卡，到客量有增長時就會行八卡了。

hello :你知唔知闊門車有個問題就係少左位坐??
少左位坐果架車係邊架?? 就係你口中果架15000系呀大哥

你估無人諗過NSL用6門車咩?? 最大問題就係無位坐呀嘛哥哥
呢度有班先輩已經諗過呢個問題啦，但全部都係比「無位坐」呢個point否決左，所以你都唔洗諗落去

成條NSL由羅湖企去中環真係你企埋我果份，句號

做幾乎全企位列車根本就是一件好事，只在頭尾兩卡保留少量座位就可以了。反正南北線是“市區集體運輸”鐵路（我不信到了2020年時大埔、上水還是荒山野嶺），是流水用途的，站站都有大量乘客上落（就正如巴士的流水線經常性下層企人，上層半空一樣），難道深圳地鐵羅寶線設計時真的會預計有大量乘客從羅湖、老街、會展中心等地方坐到機場東？！如果這些長途流水鐵路真的有那麼多人搭，電車堅尼地城至筲箕灣就不用只開半小時一班啦！

miklcct :

l_arco :

Waihorace :[ 圖檔 ]
龜龜唔係想開27 tph咩...

龜鐵對外向人講D野信得過架咩?
龜鐵由三年前到而家夠話EWL行八卡啦，不過呢紙就包唔住火既

Alexander200 :

miklcct :

l_arco :

Waihorace :[ 圖檔 ]
龜龜唔係想開27 tph咩...

龜鐵對外向人講D野信得過架咩?
龜鐵由三年前到而家夠話EWL行八卡啦，不過呢紙就包唔住火既

應該好快有新合約!

Alexander200 :

miklcct :

l_arco :

Waihorace :[ 圖檔 ]
龜龜唔係想開27 tph咩...

龜鐵對外向人講D野信得過架咩?
龜鐵由三年前到而家夠話EWL行八卡啦，不過呢紙就包唔住火既

應該好快有新合約!

D201 :

Alexander200 :

miklcct :

l_arco :

Waihorace :[ 圖檔 ]
龜龜唔係想開27 tph咩...

龜鐵對外向人講D野信得過架咩?
龜鐵由三年前到而家夠話EWL行八卡啦，不過呢紙就包唔住火既

應該好快有新合約!

有排，通車後等到頸都長咪有lo

Waihorace :

D201 :有排，通車後等到頸都長咪有lo

我覺得龜應該考慮好似LAR Trains咁買定多一卡番嚟，有需要就盡快掛埋上去
另外，馬鐵閘門建議龜唔好考慮好似龍華線咁裝假閘，應該整埋門

不過想像還想像，龜係唔會做嘅...

Q :

Waihorace :

D201 :有排，通車後等到頸都長咪有lo

我覺得龜應該考慮好似LAR Trains咁買定多一卡番嚟，有需要就盡快掛埋上去
另外，馬鐵閘門建議龜唔好考慮好似龍華線咁裝假閘，應該整埋門

不過想像還想像，龜係唔會做嘅...

擺D吉卡幾年唔用，唔怕比人大造文章？