香港巴士論壇

AVD1 on 2016年8月26日 09:52:32:

dennis08 on 2016年8月25日 23:59:39:睇返今期CX World，過線俾港龍又好似同CX未同機師傾掂數有關

同埋已經定左港龍11月21日正式轉名

老老實實，港龍轉唔轉都好，
起坊間始終佢個名都係叫港龍

唉！11月21日轉名，又要換不知所謂的飛機塗裝。都不知道管理層為可一定要換飛機塗裝？

ATS3@2B on 2016年8月28日 00:00:45:

AVD1 on 2016年8月26日 09:52:32:

dennis08 on 2016年8月25日 23:59:39:睇返今期CX World，過線俾港龍又好似同CX未同機師傾掂數有關

同埋已經定左港龍11月21日正式轉名

老老實實，港龍轉唔轉都好，
起坊間始終佢個名都係叫港龍

唉！11月21日轉名，又要換不知所謂的飛機塗裝。都不知道管理層為可一定要換飛機塗裝？

因為佢地想整大「國泰」個名丫嗎，
但係佢地又好似唔知「國泰」其實起大陸比「港龍」名氣更低 ……

_________________
想要其他人比尊重你，請先問自己有冇尊重過人。

Hmmm, this route is crowded by many LCCs and i guess the lower operating costs of Cathay Dragon, as it is a regional based airline aimmed at middle tier markets, will help lower the price of the route to keep it competitive but keeping the standards a knot higher than the rest as a full service airline. I think Cathay is taking advantage of this strategy, as i think KUL-HKG is more of a leisure route. As compared to Singapore where it is a premium heavy route due to the financial centres in both country, with premium equipped aircraft between SQ and CX serving more than 16 flights a day

matthewgtr on 2016年9月2日 09:17:04:Hmmm, this route is crowded by many LCCs and i guess the lower operating costs of Cathay Dragon, as it is a regional based airline aimmed at middle tier markets, will help lower the price of the route to keep it competitive but keeping the standards a knot higher than the rest as a full service airline. I think Cathay is taking advantage of this strategy, as i think KUL-HKG is more of a leisure route. As compared to Singapore where it is a premium heavy route due to the financial centres in both country, with premium equipped aircraft between SQ and CX serving more than 16 flights a day

講 leisure，大把線都比 KUL 更 leisure，
KUL 始終起東南亞黎講都係大 port，無啦啦轉去 KA 做放棄馬來西亞市場，
我又真心唔係好明國泰今次搞乜 ……

當然你話佢起入面做數，做返好些小條數（將堆 Yield 較低 o既線轉去比 KA 谷靚自己 CX 條數呢，咁就冇得講。不過以我所知 CX 仲有大把盈利唔高 o既航點）……

_________________
想要其他人比尊重你，請先問自己有冇尊重過人。