the director of HKO estimated that HK will no winter by the mid-21 century/ earlier. Is his estimation reasonable?? With explain :wink:

如果我寫reasonable, 我有d咩pt.?
依家既pt:
1) HK is highly urbanized -> effect of global warming (ie: increase temp.)
2) Less cold days in each year
3) Electricity consumption higher -> more fossil fuels to be burnt to produce the electricity -> emission of greenhouse gas increase

有冇d咩pt係可以stick埋, 又有咩pt唔可以寫/應該加落去??

thx a lot

[發現中三既LS同中四既LS係兩回事... ]

In L.S, you should not write only one-side points of view. Therefore, you should also consider the negetive factor,and write why you don't agree with these negetive factor.
If the full marks of the question is 8, writing one side will get 4 at most.
Just make one example
Althrough someone claimed that Hong Kong will use cleaner fuels to generate electricity, fossil fuel still occupy most of the proportion, it is limited to reduce the emission of greenhouse gas.

and you should write more global factor instead of just writing the local factor you 've listed. Local factor is not a really important factor causing the rise of temperature.

Horta :In L.S, you should not write only one-side points of view. Therefore, you should also consider the negetive factor,and write why you don't agree with these negetive factor.
If the full marks of the question is 8, writing one side will get 4 at most.
Just make one example
Althrough someone claimed that Hong Kong will use cleaner fuels to generate electricity, fossil fuel still occupy most of the proportion, it is limited to reduce the emission of greenhouse gas.

and you should write more global factor instead of just writing the local factor you 've listed. Local factor is not a really important factor causing the rise of temperature.

This is what "critical think" marker want to see