GK9141@93A :

teddybus :
又黎呢套搶資源論? 你唔悶我都厭啦...
新巴夠一樣犧牲經觀塘既796B黎成全798啦
咁我可唔可以話將軍澳人搶觀塘資源?

原本我都唔想再講搶資源論架,但段video無啦啦提左個好重要既point,我係呢度不得不added...
(point請見下面)

If you dont want to mention it again, just do what you want.
There is no way you dont want to mention it but you mention it finally
especially when your point is counter-argued tons of times....
Wont you think this is really annoying to other people?

teddybus :原來開新線經邊區唔係睇個區既客量需要, 而係要睇仁義禮智睇道德...
真係多謝熱豪大大既教導, 板友們又學到新野喇...

提返上面講個point先
明顯地,某區係度做緊「只許州官放火,不准百姓點燈」
沙田線佢地就要話事唔可以cut班次,搞到九巴版開唔成
到呢家荃灣線佢地就話有需求應該停佢地果度,
邊有咁既道理架!?

「不仁不義」可用「放火點燈」取代ok?
唔通某區有需求就可以打橫黎河蟹晒其他區同樣有需求既野架咩?
當人地區有需求於某區既時候,就話唔可以河蟹,
點解呢家某區有求於其他區,其他區就要去就某區先?
唉某區真係要檢討下啦,同其他區既關係搞到差晒...
即係你以前問過人借錢人地唔肯借,後來果個人如果問你借錢,你會唔會咁好心去借呀?

再送多一句啦:呢d野係雙向性架,你點對人,人點對你

Which district? I think you better specify, otherwise others wont understand what you mean.
89 series and Kwun Tsuen Routes pass through Kwun Tong District, of coz Kwun Tong District has the say, whats the problem of that?
and actually 798 and the proposed Tseung Tsuen Route also pass through Kwun Tong District
It is very normal for the discussion of these routes to be on the agenda of the Kwun Tong District meeting.
You dont want Kwun Tong District to have discussion on any issue about Tseung Tsuen Route? Okay, dont pass through Kwun Tong District then!

Thank you for raising a very good term 放火點燈.
This is very suitable in describing some people living in Tseung Kwan O...
They only allow their own area grabbing resources from other districts to serve their area
but when their area have excess resource, they refuse to re-distribute their excess resource to other districts in need.
Is that what your school teach you in moral education? I really cant believe it. Your school should definitely be condemned if it does so.
By the way, I would really like to remind you one thing more, the resources belong to the bus company, not you, nor your district. This is the misconception that you, as well as various Disctrict Councils have and need to be corrected.

咁我問你:
繁忙時間798有冇能力去做埋觀塘客?
咁仲行觀塘道做乜?
至於整體客量係就係唔夠其他線咁多,但同行唔行觀塘道有乜關係!?

Well, I have pointed out the reason for 798 not passing through Kwun Tong Road, didnt you ever read my words? Whats the point of repeating or rephrasing others argument again and again?

班次問題嘛,
係就係唔密車,但係密唔密車同應唔應該行觀塘道係兩回事喎
點解唔可以疏車行特快?一定要密車行路面?
263都係1x分鐘一班車,但係同樣有特快效果...
再者,大部分往火炭既客都係計岩時間先落樓
特別係新巴有貼心服務,每個將軍澳站站頭有張「南豐/新都城預計開車時間」,d人根本唔洗點等車
就算計埋搭車時間+等車(3分鐘),都一定會比經觀塘果種搭法為快...

Come on, I didnt relate it to whether it should pass through Kwun Tong Road or not at all...
The reason I raised about frequency is to show the possible reason explaining why you can see 798 buses with lots of passengers in non-rush hours... Can you get it?

所以,疏車行特快呢種政策根本無需要改變,
如果唔係只係會搞到42c咁樣去到青衣山區大把空位,真係拆觀荃+青衣特快好過啦...不過正如上面講到,九巴邊會咁諗丫,係都要班青衣南客慢慢企先啦~~

Are you sure? 307, express route from Tai Po to HK Island, has a frequency of 30 minutes. Well, it looks very easy to remember, but at the same time it is blamed by many people in the district. If you miss the bus would you spend 30 mins waiting for another one? Well, maybe you will, but I wont.
I do support splitting 42C, but the same question, where can you get the resource to do so?
The resources in Kwun Tong and Kwai Tsing are fully used and probably cant be extracted for this new express route. The only way is to extract resources from other districts, but according to somebody's view and argument, other districts should not be involved in resource re-distribution, even if there are excess resources larged wasted. Then, how can you split 42C? It would help if you know magic and conjure extra buses for Kwun Tong, but it is not the fact.
If you think merely splitting the 42C scheduled buses to serve the two split routes, this is very superficial. Look at the past example of 69 series. As I remember, schedule buses of 69C would never be the summation of those of 268C and 269C. The summation must be much larger. If you just split the numbers of 69C buses in half to serve 268C and 269C, I am sure it will be a total disaster!

論班次,論客量,論用車,論乜都好,798有排都未做到線王丫嘛

~Gavin~ :論班次,論客量,論用車,論乜都好,798有排都未做到線王丫嘛

nono, maybe it is the route king in Tseung Kwan O, oh sorry, should be merely in Tiu Keng Leng area, but definitely not in the whole Hong Kong...

~Gavin~ :論班次,論客量,論用車,論乜都好,798有排都未做到線王丫嘛

798叫線王..沙田7~8成路線都可以叫線王喇

觀塘80系/89系 果d 係咪要叫 線王之王?!

咁74X可以叫咩?!

將軍澳來說798得確是唔錯的....
其實嘈o羊呢.....

798:
呢D班次不是密, 不過易預測, 等車容易, 乘客自然鍾意
加上特快, 的確不錯

89系:
89做黃大仙特快去沙田
89X做觀塘特快第一城
89D做特快馬鞍山
89C較特別, 流水客多, 都可以說是濱景...
89B無留意......

各自有地盆, 又做o羊將89系同798一齊ling離講呢
維持現狀就可以了.....

得喇..你嘈左咁多個版
成個HKBF都知你係將軍澳大霸主熱豪兄!!
你要記住D資源唔係你架~ 你冇買到架~

講霸!?都未及觀塘霸住觀沙線資源啦...

講到分資源咁慘..
咁你做咩將796S同觀塘分
796C同旺/深區分
796X同尖/九龍城區分
798同沙田分.
694同東區分

你錯鳥,如果d車唔行出將軍澳又服務唔到將軍澳>九龍既客喎
同某d區去分資源都只係其次咋,
主要都係方便自己出街咋,你估真係真心送條線俾其他區咩?
好似796b咁囉,將軍澳區話收就收,都係為左將軍澳方便而收咋

89系日日爆到七彩..你想我點cut比你呀~
798係你地捧佢當神拜炸..最密都要15mins先有車..
你對比796B咪線王lo..對比89系果d線5mins爆一架真係行埋一二面喇!!

你又錯烏,官方試過10分鐘一班車...
密車有乜用丫,慢得濟既話,搭車既時間都耐過等車啦...

真係唔好霸霸霸..陣係識霸..霸住自己區d資源..死都唔放比人~

又唔見你對住觀塘咁叫佢放少少89系資源?

而家有人話要將798拎番落留黎行觀塘咩?..你針對得太多喇!!

係唔知邊d人真心想架架車行觀塘道...
之前有d人真係真心想觀繞無巴士行,唉...

只需問1句:又唔見果陣新巴46X 好好客?!

條線本身係冇潛質就當然連特快都冇用啦
但如果你講到798冇潛質既話,我就唔會成日見到798頂閘啦

仲有46X落左公路後都仲要停好多盞燈,行公路既路段唔多,唔可以同798主打公路比..

拆左都唔夠車開觀荃..可以拇到幾多車出黎? 況且青公<>青衣要解決既問題~

30架42c 12~13(青):17~18(荃)差唔多啦,唔夠車!?
唔夠咪好似798開左之後先慢慢諗位加車囉,點解新巴會咁做九巴就唔會先?
況且你提及既問題我唔見得係一個問題...

你個霸資源論..講足5,6篇文..鎖左3篇.. 你收左2個警告..唔知幾多個注意..
我都燥燥地.. 但你可以繼續唔夠喉要講..你真係好野!!
係HKBF 捷哂你糊~ 真係唔想比D咁既人覺得佢果套係岩~

唔係我想講架,係唔知點解有d人係要用細字mode,方死d野唔出街咁....

Which district? I think you better specify, otherwise others wont understand what you mean.

就算唔指明,我諗你根據上文下理都解得到..

89 series and Kwun Tsuen Routes pass through Kwun Tong District, of coz Kwun Tong District has the say, whats the problem of that?

89系我係指緊抽車俾將軍澳行將荃,但係89系有d人唔肯,呢個就係問題
觀荃唔係問題既,不過有d人就話要將荃行觀塘道停站就係問題啦

You dont want Kwun Tong District to have discussion on any issue about Tseung Tsuen Route? Okay, dont pass through Kwun Tong District then!

嘩高見!!!觀塘繞道原來有得俾觀塘客落車既~~
師兄真係要繼續賜教~~

Thank you for raising a very good term 放火點燈.
This is very suitable in describing some people living in Tseung Kwan O...
They only allow their own area grabbing resources from other districts to serve their area
but when their area have excess resource, they refuse to re-distribute their excess resource to other districts in need.
Is that what your school teach you in moral education? I really cant believe it. Your school should definitely be condemned if it does so.

乜叫excess先?
將軍澳都有好多線頂閘喎(eg 98d 98c 798),就好似你地講到89系「名正言順」咁唔俾減班
就算有位都優先開將荃啦
成個區根本再冇excess資源
如果你覺得當時89系好多人搭,呢家將軍澳車源一樣咁緊張,根本冇得俾你抽車黎重組

仲講道德呀?我唔想再收警告呀,自己知道想河蟹人地資源就道義心照啦
送多句:君子愛財,取之有道,你估真係可以亂咁黎咩...

By the way, I would really like to remind you one thing more, the resources belong to the bus company, not you, nor your district. This is the misconception that you, as well as various Disctrict Councils have and need to be corrected.

巴士公司咪又係因為議員壓力!?
議員壓力源自果區既人咋...
講咁多資源係巴士公司,兜咁大個圈做乜先?

Well, I have pointed out the reason for 798 not passing through Kwun Tong Road, didnt you ever read my words? Whats the point of repeating or rephrasing others argument again and again?

咁煩請解釋下點解九巴版要行觀塘道

Come on, I didnt relate it to whether it should pass through Kwun Tong Road or not at all...
The reason I raised about frequency is to show the possible reason explaining why you can see 798 buses with lots of passengers in non-rush hours... Can you get it?

「線王」除左睇班次之外仲有好多資源要睇,例如走線,
你估下如果74x行獅子山會唔會冇左一批客?

Are you sure? 307, express route from Tai Po to HK Island, has a frequency of 30 minutes. Well, it looks very easy to remember, but at the same time it is blamed by many people in the district. If you miss the bus would you spend 30 mins waiting for another one? Well, maybe you will, but I wont.

所以新巴有句說話寫左係班次表「乘客應提早三分鐘到巴士站候車」
下下計到盡既時候,當然係你既問題啦...

where can you get the resource to do so?

之前個post都提過,今次回文上面都提過,請參考上面

The resources in Kwun Tong and Kwai Tsing are fully used and probably cant be extracted for this new express route. The only way is to extract resources from other districts, but according to somebody's view and argument, other districts should not be involved in resource re-distribution, even if there are excess resources larged wasted. Then, how can you split 42C? It would help if you know magic and conjure extra buses for Kwun Tong, but it is not the fact.

42c係咪有九龍灣車廠派車呀...呢個問題我都答過過幾廿次啦
青衣廠留返青衣特快,九龍灣廠開觀荃...

If you think merely splitting the 42C scheduled buses to serve the two split routes, this is very superficial. Look at the past example of 69 series. As I remember, schedule buses of 69C would never be the summation of those of 268C and 269C. The summation must be much larger. If you just split the numbers of 69C buses in half to serve 268C and 269C, I am sure it will be a total disaster!

就算當年69c唔拆,就根本應付唔黎元朗客
就算唔拆都要加班先可以serve晒元朗天水圍
九巴當做個好心咁俾天水圍有特快路線咋

但係42c拆就唔同
其中一條取道特快公路,
條路短左又快左,直接減低全程行車時間
(留意269c行元朗公路唔減得幾多行車時間,因為佢同大棠路平排,最多只係cut走d停燈時間)
所以呢度可以抽多幾架車出黎

情況就同A29+E22A一樣
E22A拉疏少少就開到A29,因A29行特快,
最後E22A+A29可以做到15分鐘一班來往機場班次,比現時20-30分鐘為少

s0493 :
新巴唔夠資源就淨係識得一味開線同延長?
我可以好肯定答你唔係lo
唔夠資源仲點開線同延長呀
人地只係善用資源線換線
雖然運吉o既''影響力''
但係點解人地新巴可以過到區議會,九巴唔得呢
某程度上係九巴自己攞黎
你睇下人地新巴點樣運用每個區o既投票權
迎合最多受惠o既區
爭取最多票數通過
而九巴呢 ?
改線係改到人地每個區都反對
最後就話人地阻住晒

根本新巴由頭到尾都唔夠車
港島都搞唔掂走去搞將軍澳
無車學咩人去康城插旗 ?
而家康城有好多人住 ?
地鐵都係做緊接駁
唔夠車既新巴走去做市區 ?
無野嘛 ?

再者 , 唔好係度神化新創建
寶馬山堆線年年改年年 Ban

港島東出事?
我就真係唔太明有咩事出左事啦
最多都係話82m呀,頻密隧線清左批流水客咁
呢d野其實對於乘客係好事
冇咩問題

唔好淨係留係 BF 做井底蛙
去下其他論壇 , 你會睇到好多唔同既野
而家新創建既流水線做得好好 ?
條 722 又做得好好 ?

南區就食柴食到而家呢樣野咪又係多謝運吉lo
係咁cut中巴線比城巴
根本就係中巴同運吉o既問題
新巴宜家都合併左啦
點會畀力落去呢

關 TD 咩事 ?
新巴係三巴裡面擁有特低地台車既比例係最高
但係點解佢依然要將 3A 黨放入南區 ?
放部 16XX 會死嗎 ?
好喇 , 而家得番兩個 A , 40XX 55XX 都已經入左好多
批 40XX 多到要行 8P 等線
點解唔可以放入 38 ?
之前就話無車 , 而家又有咩藉口 ?

點講都好
新巴同城巴做野比九巴係積極好多lo
你睇下新城o既司機人數就知
唔係淨係九巴缺人
新城都唔夠人ga
不過人地寧願出多d錢叫車長例番都唔去收車
呢個已經抵讚啦
仲有人地路線班次o既準確度的確係好好
當然有d線會甩甩地
但只係頻密線
唔頻密o既線個誤差真係可以做到+-5分鐘
唔似九巴咁一時就20分鐘一時40分鐘一時60分鐘一班咁lo

但唔代表九巴唔積極
大大條 14D 40P 同 93M 已經可以塞住閣下把口
新巴準確度好好 ?
點解仲會有人係度話條 905 970 個準確度好低 ?
再者呢 , 唔好淨係一味靠 Up 話九巴 60 分鐘一班車
唔好無視路面情況呢樣東西

好似gk兄咁講
香港勝在有新創建
多一間九巴=多一間搵人笨公司

九巴揾你笨 ?
人地點揾你笨 ?
價錢唔合理嗎 ?
但我都唔見得新巴個價錢做得好好

如果搵到有唔正確o既野就插我

如果我係你 , 我就唔會咁大聲話 有錯請插
成篇野根本大把位俾人插

根本新巴由頭到尾都唔夠車
港島都搞唔掂走去搞將軍澳
無車學咩人去康城插旗 ?
而家康城有好多人住 ?
地鐵都係做緊接駁
唔夠車既新巴走去做市區 ?
無野嘛 ?

唔夠車都係因為TD唔俾加姐,你估老新好想

關 TD 咩事 ?
新巴係三巴裡面擁有特低地台車既比例係最高
但係點解佢依然要將 3A 黨放入南區 ?
放部 16XX 會死嗎 ?
好喇 , 而家得番兩個 A , 40XX 55XX 都已經入左好多
批 40XX 多到要行 8P 等線
點解唔可以放入 38 ?
之前就話無車 , 而家又有咩藉口 ?

以我所知,我係見過590A好多1_xx同埋42都有唔少50xx,42C都行過40xx幾廿次..

3A都可能只係方便維修姐
你估下將軍澳廠既維修員見50xx多d定見VA多d呢?

唔好無視路面情況呢樣東西

當真?次次脫班有邊次唔係話路面情況?
就好似早期有本壇巴打話旺角等69x,5~6班68x都未有69x,
唔通又係路面情況!?

九巴揾你笨 ?
人地點揾你笨 ?
價錢唔合理嗎 ?
但我都唔見得新巴個價錢做得好好

當真當真,
98C同796C一比,98C即被秒殺...上秀區仲貴過796C...
98A同796S一比,98A同樣慘敗
仲有98D/297同796X比,
仲有好多好多...未能盡錄

GK9141@93A :就算唔指明,我諗你根據上文下理都解得到..

Well, is it very difficult to speicify which district it is? I found that you really like asking people to guess what you type, by somewhat like putting underscore. I am not your heart nor your mind, I dont want to take the risk of guessing it wrongly and misunderstand what you want to express. One more thing, this is bus chat area, not guessing area, clear expression is somehow crucial in this area I am pretty sure...

You dont want Kwun Tong District to have discussion on any issue about Tseung Tsuen Route? Okay, dont pass through Kwun Tong District then!

嘩高見!!!觀塘繞道原來有得俾觀塘客落車既~~
師兄真係要繼續賜教~~

Sorry, as I know, as far as it passed through any road in that particular District, no matter it has stops in that particular District or not, it would be still included in the concern of that particular District. If you know it is not the case, you are welcome to remind me POLITELY...

Thank you for raising a very good term 放火點燈.
This is very suitable in describing some people living in Tseung Kwan O...
They only allow their own area grabbing resources from other districts to serve their area
but when their area have excess resource, they refuse to re-distribute their excess resource to other districts in need.
Is that what your school teach you in moral education? I really cant believe it. Your school should definitely be condemned if it does so.

乜叫excess先?
將軍澳都有好多線頂閘喎(eg 98d 98c 798),就好似你地講到89系「名正言順」咁唔俾減班
就算有位都優先開將荃啦
成個區根本再冇excess資源
如果你覺得當時89系好多人搭,呢家將軍澳車源一樣咁緊張,根本冇得俾你抽車黎重組

仲講道德呀?我唔想再收警告呀,自己知道想河蟹人地資源就道義心照啦
送多句:君子愛財,取之有道,你估真係可以亂咁黎咩...

At least 690 and 692 can release buses, I am sure you admit. Then, well, how often does 98D 98C and 798 have the full load? 215X can get full load even for the last bus, can your 98D, 98C and 798 do that? I really bet sorry. Then when you put priority of adding extra bus, I cant see why you dont add buses to the routes that can have full load even for the last bus but remain in some area that only have half or even less than half capacity in the last few frequency? It is really unreasonable.

Huh, did you ask your Geography teacher whether resources re-allocation is a matter of 搶資源 or even 河蟹? 君子愛財,取之有道, what a good sentence. 取之有道, according to my limited Chinese (Up to S7 level), you take the resources and use it in somewhere in need. Rearrange resource from area with excessive buses to the area in need is exactly achieving "取之有道". Do you agree?

By the way, I would really like to remind you one thing more, the resources belong to the bus company, not you, nor your district. This is the misconception that you, as well as various Disctrict Councils have and need to be corrected.

巴士公司咪又係因為議員壓力!?
議員壓力源自果區既人咋...
講咁多資源係巴士公司,兜咁大個圈做乜先?

Well, that's just to remind you your so-called resources belong to bus company, not you, so you have no right to curse others for grabbing the resources if the bus company rearrange buses from one place to another.

Well, I have pointed out the reason for 798 not passing through Kwun Tong Road, didnt you ever read my words? Whats the point of repeating or rephrasing others argument again and again?

咁煩請解釋下點解九巴版要行觀塘道

Come on, are you kidding? I am not working in KMB, how do I know? Perhaps they dont have confidence in the potential number of passenger in Tseung Sha Route and so they give a more conservative suggestion by passing the route through Kwun Tong Road. But I have to emphasize this is just what I guess.

Come on, I didnt relate it to whether it should pass through Kwun Tong Road or not at all...
The reason I raised about frequency is to show the possible reason explaining why you can see 798 buses with lots of passengers in non-rush hours... Can you get it?

「線王」除左睇班次之外仲有好多資源要睇,例如走線,
你估下如果74x行獅子山會唔會冇左一批客?

Are you directly relating to the things I have said? I doubt. Anyway, 70X passed through Lion Rock Tunnel and even has stops in Tai Po Service Road West. Does it affect the number of passengers? No, and even have to split one more route 277X...

Are you sure? 307, express route from Tai Po to HK Island, has a frequency of 30 minutes. Well, it looks very easy to remember, but at the same time it is blamed by many people in the district. If you miss the bus would you spend 30 mins waiting for another one? Well, maybe you will, but I wont.

所以新巴有句說話寫左係班次表「乘客應提早三分鐘到巴士站候車」
下下計到盡既時候,當然係你既問題啦...

Well, if you depart from somewhere else and need to get another bus before catching 307, can you choose reserving 3 minutes for waiting?

where can you get the resource to do so?

之前個post都提過,今次回文上面都提過,請參考上面

Did you? Oh, you mean merely spitting 42C schedule buses in half? I have pointed out the impossibility of this thing and like what you have said I am not going to repeat anymore

The resources in Kwun Tong and Kwai Tsing are fully used and probably cant be extracted for this new express route. The only way is to extract resources from other districts, but according to somebody's view and argument, other districts should not be involved in resource re-distribution, even if there are excess resources larged wasted. Then, how can you split 42C? It would help if you know magic and conjure extra buses for Kwun Tong, but it is not the fact.

42c係咪有九龍灣車廠派車呀...呢個問題我都答過過幾廿次啦
青衣廠留返青衣特快,九龍灣廠開觀荃...

Do you completely digest and understand what I have said?
Or do you want me to be more specific, there are no room for routes operated by Kowloon Bay Depot and Tsing yi Depot to extract excessive resources? Oh I just remember, schedule buses of 13D and 13X come from Tseung Kwan O Depot, why dont we do the same thing for the Split routes for 42C?

If you think merely splitting the 42C scheduled buses to serve the two split routes, this is very superficial. Look at the past example of 69 series. As I remember, schedule buses of 69C would never be the summation of those of 268C and 269C. The summation must be much larger. If you just split the numbers of 69C buses in half to serve 268C and 269C, I am sure it will be a total disaster!

就算當年69c唔拆,就根本應付唔黎元朗客
就算唔拆都要加班先可以serve晒元朗天水圍
九巴當做個好心咁俾天水圍有特快路線咋

但係42c拆就唔同
其中一條取道特快公路,
條路短左又快左,直接減低全程行車時間
(留意269c行元朗公路唔減得幾多行車時間,因為佢同大棠路平排,最多只係cut走d停燈時間)
所以呢度可以抽多幾架車出黎

情況就同A29+E22A一樣
E22A拉疏少少就開到A29,因A29行特快,
最後E22A+A29可以做到15分鐘一班來往機場班次,比現時20-30分鐘為少

[/quote]

I am talking about the change in the number of buses used after splitting the route, what are you raising the reason for splitting route for? It is completely not related at all...

Maybe we can never think of taking buses from 692 unless 692 changes to a route which only operates during the rushing hours.
To move the 692 in order to take buses, there are two ways to do that:
1) Cancel the route -----> The Disctrict Coucil will beat you hardly
2) Change the route ---> Again, beaten by the DC.

601 :Maybe we can never think of taking buses from 692 unless 692 changes to a route which only operates during the rushing hours.
To move the 692 in order to take buses, there are two ways to do that:
1) Cancel the route -----> The Disctrict Coucil will beat you hardly
2) Change the route ---> Again, beaten by the DC.

Well I think Mr. GK9141 only concern if the Tseung Tsuen Route make stops in Kwun Tong, if there are no stops in Kwun Tong I think he doesnt care where the buses come from at all...

Oh, the main theme of this thread is 798, how come it become the argument on whether Tseung Tsuen Route should make stop in Kwun Tong Road or not? Mr. GK9141 you did a very good job...

GK9141@93A :當真當真,
98C同796C一比,98C即被秒殺...上秀區仲貴過796C...
98A同796S一比,98A同樣慘敗
仲有98D/297同796X比,
仲有好多好多...未能盡錄

296A 同 796S 一比, 796S 一下比人KO啦..
好既你唔拎黎比..近既你唔拎黎比?
你係要拎98A比?
你憎老九姐~ !!
就算係咁比 98A多車好多.
98D多車好多不突只仲快好多..


同埋我唔好拎 681 VS 962 收費比?
3D VS 15A 比?
89系VS 798比.. 798咁少車點做線王係重點
96R VS 698R比?! 點解698R咁少車.. 噢~ 秒殺!!
你咁比咩都比你嬴哂!!

你投降喇係第2度?

GK9141@93A :

得喇..你嘈左咁多個版
成個HKBF都知你係將軍澳大霸主熱豪兄!!
你要記住D資源唔係你架~ 你冇買到架~

講霸!?都未及觀塘霸住觀沙線資源啦...
霸? 你同80系89系搭開D人講叫佢唔好搭車行路lo..
班班頂閘架兩繁.. 唔夠車我仲要比你呀?

講到分資源咁慘..
咁你做咩將796S同觀塘分
796C同旺/深區分
796X同尖/九龍城區分
798同沙田分.
694同東區分

你錯鳥,如果d車唔行出將軍澳又服務唔到將軍澳>九龍既客喎
同某d區去分資源都只係其次咋,
主要都係方便自己出街咋,你估真係真心送條線俾其他區咩?
好似796b咁囉,將軍澳區話收就收,都係為左將軍澳方便而收咋
你話收就收咁勁lo..黃大仙/九龍城/觀塘區唔過你冇今日798喇!!
講到自己咁巴閉..講到拖捨人地咁~
講到需要咪又係你地班將軍澳人用多d?
一陣間比人cut線削班..睇下邊個跪地反對嗌唔好先~

89系日日爆到七彩..你想我點cut比你呀~
798係你地捧佢當神拜炸..最密都要15mins先有車..
你對比796B咪線王lo..對比89系果d線5mins爆一架真係行埋一二面喇!!

你又錯烏,官方試過10分鐘一班車...
密車有乜用丫,慢得濟既話,搭車既時間都耐過等車啦...
咁10分鐘係咪班班連爆牙? 唔係既咁點同89系果d比~
況且講加班車89系一定唔少過你條798 lo
798做線王?..諗都唔好諗~

真係唔好霸霸霸..陣係識霸..霸住自己區d資源..死都唔放比人~

又唔見你對住觀塘咁叫佢放少少89系資源?
我放比你開將荃20~30mins一班..你係咪放98A,C,D 296A,C,D 開觀荃 3~10mins一班?

而家有人話要將798拎番落留黎行觀塘咩?..你針對得太多喇!!

係唔知邊d人真心想架架車行觀塘道...
之前有d人真係真心想觀繞無巴士行,唉...
有心? 唔洗喇..
費時98D,796x 呢d線塞死哂觀塘道..
最好ban埋條93A佢喇 ..
無謂要93A行過觀塘見到我地咁衰!!

只需問1句:又唔見果陣新巴46X 好好客?!

條線本身係冇潛質就當然連特快都冇用啦
但如果你講到798冇潛質既話,我就唔會成日見到798頂閘啦

仲有46X落左公路後都仲要停好多盞燈,行公路既路段唔多,唔可以同798主打公路比..
又係你話疏車特快得既?! 咁你有覺得將荃好有潛質咩?
恐怕咪又係步46x後麈!!

拆左都唔夠車開觀荃..可以拇到幾多車出黎? 況且青公<>青衣要解決既問題~

30架42c 12~13(青):17~18(荃)差唔多啦,唔夠車!?
唔夠咪好似798開左之後先慢慢諗位加車囉,點解新巴會咁做九巴就唔會先?
況且你提及既問題我唔見得係一個問題...
17~18架..我真係想睇下觀荃頂閘頂到咩程況.. 係青公幾時先上到車~

你個霸資源論..講足5,6篇文..鎖左3篇.. 你收左2個警告..唔知幾多個注意..
我都燥燥地.. 但你可以繼續唔夠喉要講..你真係好野!!
係HKBF 捷哂你糊~ 真係唔想比D咁既人覺得佢果套係岩~

唔係我想講架,係唔知點解有d人係要用細字mode,方死d野唔出街咁....
咁係咪次次回你要用最大字+紅色+粗體?!'
係咁1齊lo~

Which district? I think you better specify, otherwise others wont understand what you mean.

就算唔指明,我諗你根據上文下理都解得到..
你講d野上文不接下理架wor

89 series and Kwun Tsuen Routes pass through Kwun Tong District, of coz Kwun Tong District has the say, whats the problem of that?

89系我係指緊抽車俾將軍澳行將荃,但係89系有d人唔肯,呢個就係問題
觀荃唔係問題既,不過有d人就話要將荃行觀塘道停站就係問題啦
都話你抽d 98系 296系 抽30部比我玩觀荃咪同你交換...
89系唔夠載..觀荃唔多再問你抽!!
睇下到時邊個嗌慘~

Thank you for raising a very good term 放火點燈.
This is very suitable in describing some people living in Tseung Kwan O...
They only allow their own area grabbing resources from other districts to serve their area
but when their area have excess resource, they refuse to re-distribute their excess resource to other districts in need.
Is that what your school teach you in moral education? I really cant believe it. Your school should definitely be condemned if it does so.

仲講道德呀?我唔想再收警告呀,自己知道想河蟹人地資源就道義心照啦
送多句:君子愛財,取之有道,你估真係可以亂咁黎咩...
你唔想比人警告咪收儉下..唔好再搞d事出黎挑釁人喇~
下次就唔係警告..比人凍版喇~

Come on, I didnt relate it to whether it should pass through Kwun Tong Road or not at all...
The reason I raised about frequency is to show the possible reason explaining why you can see 798 buses with lots of passengers in non-rush hours... Can you get it?

「線王」除左睇班次之外仲有好多資源要睇,例如走線,
你估下如果74x行獅子山會唔會冇左一批客?
咁唔知點解1A咁兜又會做到[線王之王既皇上皇]? 如果798都可以叫線王既話~

Are you sure? 307, express route from Tai Po to HK Island, has a frequency of 30 minutes. Well, it looks very easy to remember, but at the same time it is blamed by many people in the district. If you miss the bus would you spend 30 mins waiting for another one? Well, maybe you will, but I wont.

所以新巴有句說話寫左係班次表「乘客應提早三分鐘到巴士站候車」
下下計到盡既時候,當然係你既問題啦...
下下用你D時間觀念..3分鐘同30分鐘係一樣當然係你既問題啦...

where can you get the resource to do so?

之前個post都提過,今次回文上面都提過,請參考上面

The resources in Kwun Tong and Kwai Tsing are fully used and probably cant be extracted for this new express route. The only way is to extract resources from other districts, but according to somebody's view and argument, other districts should not be involved in resource re-distribution, even if there are excess resources larged wasted. Then, how can you split 42C? It would help if you know magic and conjure extra buses for Kwun Tong, but it is not the fact.

42c係咪有九龍灣車廠派車呀...呢個問題我都答過過幾廿次啦
青衣廠留返青衣特快,九龍灣廠開觀荃...
咦!! 將軍澳D車都係九龍灣廠管架wor~
咁係咪可以拎黎開觀荃?
咁好突然間轉馱呀

If you think merely splitting the 42C scheduled buses to serve the two split routes, this is very superficial. Look at the past example of 69 series. As I remember, schedule buses of 69C would never be the summation of those of 268C and 269C. The summation must be much larger. If you just split the numbers of 69C buses in half to serve 268C and 269C, I am sure it will be a total disaster!

就算當年69c唔拆,就根本應付唔黎元朗客
就算唔拆都要加班先可以serve晒元朗天水圍
九巴當做個好心咁俾天水圍有特快路線咋

但係42c拆就唔同
其中一條取道特快公路,
條路短左又快左,直接減低全程行車時間
(留意269c行元朗公路唔減得幾多行車時間,因為佢同大棠路平排,最多只係cut走d停燈時間)
所以呢度可以抽多幾架車出黎

情況就同A29+E22A一樣
E22A拉疏少少就開到A29,因A29行特快,
最後E22A+A29可以做到15分鐘一班來往機場班次,比現時20-30分鐘為少
42C分拆..觀荃要服務多大量既新客源..
用而家批車根本冇可能接收哂!!
程況同268/9C完全唔同lo~

我真係唔明,
點解某人入黍回完文就一定有交嗌

btw,798其實唔算線皇

Hin.307 :

s0493 :
新巴唔夠資源就淨係識得一味開線同延長?
我可以好肯定答你唔係lo
唔夠資源仲點開線同延長呀
人地只係善用資源線換線
雖然運吉o既''影響力''
但係點解人地新巴可以過到區議會,九巴唔得呢
某程度上係九巴自己攞黎
你睇下人地新巴點樣運用每個區o既投票權
迎合最多受惠o既區
爭取最多票數通過
而九巴呢 ?
改線係改到人地每個區都反對
最後就話人地阻住晒

其實呢係康城插旗好似係話某議員叫咁做
唔係新巴想係康城插旗