CNR4806 :點會有人夠膽講cut 89系資源，我次次繁忙時間見到，都係幾分鐘一班，班班頂晒閘囉

反正都係低能idea，不如cut左1A同3D啦！

Sorry, as I know, as far as it passed through any road in that particular District, no matter it has stops in that particular District or not, it would be still included in the concern of that particular District. If you know it is not the case, you are welcome to remind me POLITELY...

At least 690 and 692 can release buses, I am sure you admit. Then, well, how often does 98D 98C and 798 have the full load? 215X can get full load even for the last bus, can your 98D, 98C and 798 do that? I really bet sorry. Then when you put priority of adding extra bus, I cant see why you dont add buses to the routes that can have full load even for the last bus but remain in some area that only have half or even less than half capacity in the last few frequency? It is really unreasonable.

Huh, did you ask your Geography teacher whether resources re-allocation is a matter of 搶資源 or even 河蟹? 君子愛財,取之有道, what a good sentence. 取之有道, according to my limited Chinese (Up to S7 level), you take the resources and use it in somewhere in need. Rearrange resource from area with excessive buses to the area in need is exactly achieving "取之有道". Do you agree?

Well, that's just to remind you your so-called resources belong to bus company, not you, so you have no right to curse others for grabbing the resources if the bus company rearrange buses from one place to another.

Come on, are you kidding? I am not working in KMB, how do I know? Perhaps they dont have confidence in the potential number of passenger in Tseung Sha Route and so they give a more conservative suggestion by passing the route through Kwun Tong Road. But I have to emphasize this is just what I guess.

Are you directly relating to the things I have said? I doubt. Anyway, 70X passed through Lion Rock Tunnel and even has stops in Tai Po Service Road West. Does it affect the number of passengers? No, and even have to split one more route 277X...

Well, if you depart from somewhere else and need to get another bus before catching 307, can you choose reserving 3 minutes for waiting?

Oh, the main theme of this thread is 798, how come it become the argument on whether Tseung Tsuen Route should make stop in Kwun Tong Road or not? Mr. GK9141 you did a very good job...

296A 同 796S 一比, 796S 一下比人KO啦..
好既你唔拎黎比..近既你唔拎黎比?
你係要拎98A比?
你憎老九姐~ !!
就算係咁比 98A多車好多.
98D多車好多不突只仲快好多..


同埋我唔好拎 681 VS 962 收費比?
3D VS 15A 比?
89系VS 798比.. 798咁少車點做線王係重點
96R VS 698R比?! 點解698R咁少車.. 噢~ 秒殺!!
你咁比咩都比你嬴哂!!

霸? 你同80系89系搭開D人講叫佢唔好搭車行路lo..
班班頂閘架兩繁.. 唔夠車我仲要比你呀?

你話收就收咁勁lo..黃大仙/九龍城/觀塘區唔過你冇今日798喇!!
講到自己咁巴閉..講到拖捨人地咁~
講到需要咪又係你地班將軍澳人用多d?
一陣間比人cut線削班..睇下邊個跪地反對嗌唔好先~

咁10分鐘係咪班班連爆牙? 唔係既咁點同89系果d比~
況且講加班車89系一定唔少過你條798 lo
798做線王?..諗都唔好諗~

我放比你開將荃20~30mins一班..你係咪放98A,C,D 296A,C,D 開觀荃 3~10mins一班?

又係你話疏車特快得既?! 咁你有覺得將荃好有潛質咩?
恐怕咪又係步46x後麈!!

17~18架..我真係想睇下觀荃頂閘頂到咩程況.. 係青公幾時先上到車~

你講d野上文不接下理架wor

都話你抽d 98系 296系 抽30部比我玩觀荃咪同你交換...
89系唔夠載..觀荃唔多再問你抽!!
睇下到時邊個嗌慘~

咁唔知點解1A咁兜又會做到[線王之王既皇上皇]? 如果798都可以叫線王既話~

下下用你D時間觀念..3分鐘同30分鐘係一樣當然係你既問題啦

咦!! 將軍澳D車都係九龍灣廠管架wor~
咁係咪可以拎黎開觀荃?
咁好突然間轉馱呀

我真係唔明,
點解某人入黍回完文就一定有交嗌

§※寂寞之子※§ :隧線拎黎清流水真係唔想lo..
呢樣加埋塞車..條106官方班次係81mins
但有幾何做到?! 成日都超半個鐘至40分鐘..
d車飛黎飛去又甩哂班..
你流水咪覺得好事..咁有d人要過海架嘛~
而過海客就堆哂落118度.. 結果118朝早0700爆到2400收工!!
北角以東冇118果d仲慘..搭巴士40mins先過到海~

更唔講118北角陪兜問題~

GK9141@93A :我廢事又被人暗算「離題神功」收警告啦
同798/新巴(包括新巴vs九巴)冇關既野我儘量講少d

Sorry, as I know, as far as it passed through any road in that particular District, no matter it has stops in that particular District or not, it would be still included in the concern of that particular District. If you know it is not the case, you are welcome to remind me POLITELY...

咁觀塘繞道當然屬於觀塘
但係觀塘繞道起既目的絕對唔係為左方便觀塘區既人先囉
(或者係既,只限於幫你疏道觀塘道交通等你冇咁塞車咋)
如果你覺得觀塘有權去「左右」經觀繞既非觀塘巴士線,未免太天真吧?

At least 690 and 692 can release buses, I am sure you admit. Then, well, how often does 98D 98C and 798 have the full load? 215X can get full load even for the last bus, can your 98D, 98C and 798 do that? I really bet sorry. Then when you put priority of adding extra bus, I cant see why you dont add buses to the routes that can have full load even for the last bus but remain in some area that only have half or even less than half capacity in the last few frequency? It is really unreasonable.

過海三寶咪係開將荃既資源囉,你估將軍澳冇需求架?
98C?11點都仲有機會企滿喎
798?就算企唔滿都坐到大半,仲有新巴點幫到215X呀...

Huh, did you ask your Geography teacher whether resources re-allocation is a matter of 搶資源 or even 河蟹? 君子愛財,取之有道, what a good sentence. 取之有道, according to my limited Chinese (Up to S7 level), you take the resources and use it in somewhere in need. Rearrange resource from area with excessive buses to the area in need is exactly achieving "取之有道". Do you agree?

no,因為本身就冇excess既情況

Well, that's just to remind you your so-called resources belong to bus company, not you, so you have no right to curse others for grabbing the resources if the bus company rearrange buses from one place to another.

唔好迴避問題,「巴士公司咪又係因為議員壓力!?」
我呢家係point out緊段片既main theme,
地區人士係可以左右巴士發展
冇錯資源唔係我自己,但係我向地區人士反映下就有機會左右大局
想當年九巴都唔知係咪比觀塘班議員左右晒,唉

Come on, are you kidding? I am not working in KMB, how do I know? Perhaps they dont have confidence in the potential number of passenger in Tseung Sha Route and so they give a more conservative suggestion by passing the route through Kwun Tong Road. But I have to emphasize this is just what I guess.

咁你又覺得點解新巴版唔洗經觀塘道?
莫非九巴估錯數?咁真係天大笑話...

Are you directly relating to the things I have said? I doubt. Anyway, 70X passed through Lion Rock Tunnel and even has stops in Tai Po Service Road West. Does it affect the number of passengers? No, and even have to split one more route 277X...

[略回]277X咪就係特快出黎既效果囉,如果唔拆線我真係好擔心70X喎
70X因為有左277X先快返d,多d客咋,本末倒置...

Well, if you depart from somewhere else and need to get another bus before catching 307, can you choose reserving 3 minutes for waiting?

Well
我會落左第一程車之後睇下錶,
得返幾分鐘既就去車站等車
仲有十幾分鐘就會去個廁所,買杯野飲,話晒都係長途車嘛?

Oh, the main theme of this thread is 798, how come it become the argument on whether Tseung Tsuen Route should make stop in Kwun Tong Road or not? Mr. GK9141 you did a very good job...

我借798+九巴將沙版既例子講新巴比九巴進取咋,再附加個42C拆線方案做論點
點知有幾條友係度抽乾我,呢家我都廢事回呢點,廢事俾人話離題

我真係唔明,
點解某人入黍回完文就一定有交嗌

咁係因為某d人係要觀塘區有多d車行,又或者有d人太「井」而未經歷新巴優質服務先會唔同意小弟一番真心話姐

一開始比新巴入主將軍澳已經係錯誤
(先唔好理九巴冇投標同埋而家佢服務質素係點)

Excuse me, dont put the blame on others, it is not justice at all.

Why not? For example, if there are many buses route passing through Kwun Tong Bypass (even they dont have any stops in Kwun Tong), making the road conguestion in Kwun Tong Bypass and roads nearby more serious, I dont think Kwun Tong District has no say on that. If it is the case, it would be very terrible.

Are you sure? Tons of people are already arguing that there are rooms for cutting the frequency of Tseung Kwan O routes, and what I experience from the reality is bus routes in Kwun Tong are much more in need than Tseung Kwan O. But you have presupposition on Kwun Tong Routes and neglect the tough operation in bus routes in Kwun Tong, then what can we discuss?

Have you just stayed in TKO for your whole life and didnt have a chance to go to Kwun Tong to take a look?
I dont think you will say the same thing if you go to Kwun Tong and see how chaotic and inadequate Kwun Tong bus services is, Mr. GK9141.

Oh I finally know who makes Ms Fong giving such ignorant suggestion like extending 98S and 796X to LOHAS Park and start the operation of 98D Speical service from LOHAS Park, which is totally a waste of resources. Would you feel ashame of doing so?

I dont know what year you are refering to, but Kwun Tong is a developed busy area, with many people going in and out (even for now), then that is very common and reasonable for bus company to put more resources in Kwun Tong. Comparatively, what is TKO? Can it be called as busy as Kwun Tong? No kidding please Mr. GK9141.

Different bus companies have different perspective, and also their willingness in taking risk is different. I dont think this can show that XXX company is more aggressive or so, or even worth to discuss...

Sorry, but the reality is the other way round. But as far as you think that passing through hills is detouring, passing through Kwun Tong Road is detouring, making more stops would make the people dislike the routes and etc, I dont think there is any room for discussion.

Well why dont I take the alternative transport system instead? Perhaps I would be in most than a half of the trip in that 30 mins already. I know you have plenty of time to enjoy waiting for another bus, but sorry we dont.

Well again, dont put the blame on others. This only shows you are arrogant, injustice and immoral.

If you say this to those living in Hong Kong Island I am afraid they will get fainted. and actually I dont think 796X is really that so-called "優質"...

GK9141@93A :我廢事又被人暗算「離題神功」收警告啦
同798/新巴(包括新巴vs九巴)冇關既野我儘量講少d
咁你覺得自己係咪冇問題? 唔洗負責任?!
唔好將自己都有錯既地方推落埋人地度~

296A 同 796S 一比, 796S 一下比人KO啦..
好既你唔拎黎比..近既你唔拎黎比?
你係要拎98A比?
你憎老九姐~ !!
就算係咁比 98A多車好多.
98D多車好多不突只仲快好多..


同埋我唔好拎 681 VS 962 收費比?
3D VS 15A 比?
89系VS 798比.. 798咁少車點做線王係重點
96R VS 698R比?! 點解698R咁少車.. 噢~ 秒殺!!
你咁比咩都比你嬴哂!!

喂喂準巨,
人地Hin.307話用價錢比呀(請見#22),
你用左d乜野比呀?
296A vs 796S都係打個和咋...
仲有你唔好俾我批死九巴之後又發盈警加價,搞到796S反敗為勝呀...


你都唔跟遊戲規則玩既,真正玩晒果個係邊個就心照啦
我用第2 d 野比唔係有問題呀嘛?
你一個人唔可以定哂成個遊戲規則嫁lo

霸? 你同80系89系搭開D人講叫佢唔好搭車行路lo..
班班頂閘架兩繁.. 唔夠車我仲要比你呀?

煩請觀荃都唔好打將軍澳主意,因為我前面都提及將軍澳都冇excess車俾你去用
93A,93K,297等......
觀塘亦都冇excess車俾你去用

你話收就收咁勁lo..黃大仙/九龍城/觀塘區唔過你冇今日798喇!!
講到自己咁巴閉..講到拖捨人地咁~
講到需要咪又係你地班將軍澳人用多d?
一陣間比人cut線削班..睇下邊個跪地反對嗌唔好先~

係有潛質既點會俾人cut丫...條線本身冇潛質,就算地區人士唔過,巴士公司都會慢慢陰乾啦(就好似幾架51既車去左251M)
重點係我地當日唔比你CUT..你唔會有今日798..~

咁10分鐘係咪班班連爆牙? 唔係既咁點同89系果d比~
況且講加班車89系一定唔少過你條798 lo
798做線王?..諗都唔好諗~

唉慢車點做得到線王呀...
74X做都未到89系果d車做啦
你睇下89D要入黃泥頭,真係馬市多得佢唔少...
89X?X線根本就唔快,係第一城停燈停到噴血,
九龍方向,如果一齊有車,真係分分鐘798跑左大半條觀繞既時候89X先岩岩上大老山隧道咋

密車有乜用丫,仲要快先有用嘛...
89系想做線王,免了
線王一定要快?!
89D仲爆過74X囉講真~
入黃泥頭係歷史問題~
89X根本服務重點唔係沙市..之前已講~
愉翠苑上咪快~
對比新巴條970X都唔係快架..係香港仔~
再離譜仲有N8X..正頭假X線.~~

我放比你開將荃20~30mins一班..你係咪放98A,C,D 296A,C,D 開觀荃 3~10mins一班?

98A,C,D 296A,c,D根本就冇excess資源俾你去開觀荃,恕未能啦...
80系,89系本就冇excess資源俾你去開將荃/當年將沙,恕未能啦...
咁你就唔好再嘈我地唔比資源黎~ 唔該~

又係你話疏車特快得既?! 咁你有覺得將荃好有潛質咩?
恐怕咪又係步46x後麈!!

46X得少少路行特快有乜野用啦...overall黎講真係稱唔上特快
798根本就唔可以同46X比,798果種係點到點,46X去南區既話就唔係點到點了
將荃有冇潛質同將荃係咪特快冇乜關係喎...
個程況就同89X一樣..唔好一味嘈老九..新記一樣有呢D情況~
睇野唔該睇遠D..唔好陣係睇埋一面~
仲有798又何嘗唔係一樣咩?! 同89X一樣..係調景嶺都係要兜~

17~18架..我真係想睇下觀荃頂閘頂到咩程況.. 係青公幾時先上到車~

咁好過你呢家見到40都唔上喎
同樣道理..咁點解有人見到93K,95出旺角會唔上要等98C?

你講d野上文不接下理架wor

咁應該係你既問題
唔好覺得自己完全冇錯plz~

都話你抽d 98系 296系 抽30部比我玩觀荃咪同你交換...
89系唔夠載..觀荃唔多再問你抽!!
睇下到時邊個嗌慘~

咪玩啦
講到交換?咁不如拎89系開觀荃啦
仲有,如果觀荃係有客既就唔會變左小巴做啦...
重覆10次..
何以你們同我們交換9X系296系將軍澳路線就恕未能..
卻又要我們交出89系路線給你們?
何以你這麼霸道?

咁唔知點解1A咁兜又會做到[線王之王既皇上皇]? 如果798都可以叫線王既話~

1A果種係食流水客
我想問89系又係咪食流水客呀...
快得黎又唔係特快果種,慢得黎又唔係食流水客果種
兩個extreme都唔到,想做線王都線難
重點係線王再在於快慢..
快不一定就是線王
慢不一定就是頹線.
定線如何受人歡迎+服務最多人是重點.

下下用你D時間觀念..3分鐘同30分鐘係一樣當然係你既問題啦

雖然我重申左好多萬次,但總係有d人唔知邊度出事聽唔入腦
我真係有需要糾正多次我之前講既野,你嚴重既理解錯誤
我係針對頂閘呢個case,先講「3分鐘班次頂閘=30分鐘班次頂閘」
上面「」句子並唔係你可以當做數咁約左「班次頂閘」呢幾隻字
恕未聽過什麼叫「班次頂閘」
不是你作的名詞就是對的~
事實上,
798開線時20~30分鐘搞到頂閘,已經有加班既需要,呢家就情況略有改善
98D繁時約6分鐘一班車都係頂閘,同樣有加班需要..

38繁時約6分鐘一班車都係頂閘,同樣有加班需要..
42C繁時約6分鐘一班車都係頂閘,同樣有加班需要..
74X繁時約3分鐘一班車都係頂閘,同樣有加班需要..
89繁時約5分鐘一班車都係頂閘,同樣有加班需要..
89C繁時約7分鐘一班車都係頂閘,同樣有加班需要..
89D繁時約5分鐘一班車都係頂閘,同樣有加班需要..
89X繁時約6分鐘一班車都係頂閘,同樣有加班需要..
277X繁時約7分鐘一班車都係頂閘,同樣有加班需要..

Thats Why?
如果你都係聽唔入耳,咁你就當因為你自己既問題而故意誤解3分鐘同30分鐘係一樣啦
故意誤解都講得出= =
仲有d咩新名詞?

咦!! 將軍澳D車都係九龍灣廠管架wor~
咁係咪可以拎黎開觀荃?
咁好突然間轉馱呀

原來九龍灣廠可以叫「閃廠」!?
根本就係兩間廠...
講明左九龍灣廠管..不是嘛?

我真係唔明,
點解某人入黍回完文就一定有交嗌

咁係因為某d人係要觀塘區有多d車行,又或者有d人太「井」而未經歷新巴優質服務先會唔同意小弟一番真心話姐
新巴優質就唔會
27貴過529
720/A貴過780/88/89
796S唔會比人cut到20/25..296A仲咁多人搭
798唔會咁早收
有796C唔搭..搭296C出旺角.
將南唔計796X.冇條線對抗到鐵..冇條線繁時做個位數班次..
唔會上VA車落雨漏水.
搭111好似搭左垃圾車.堆哂D車番九龍..出港島4班車夾埋得1班(15mins日日如是)
而九巴至多都係7mins.
唔係陣係九記識甩..新記一樣識~
30X最初果排就唔會真X加站加到變假X..比人投訴先改

GK9141@93A :

Excuse me, dont put the blame on others, it is not justice at all.

Excuse me,我唔回應人地會覺得佢地自己d pt好合理架,
就好似3分鐘同30分鐘果個誤解都仲係度,但我講又即係離題,咁我應該點做!?

Why not? For example, if there are many buses route passing through Kwun Tong Bypass (even they dont have any stops in Kwun Tong), making the road conguestion in Kwun Tong Bypass and roads nearby more serious, I dont think Kwun Tong District has no say on that. If it is the case, it would be very terrible.

老老實實呢家93K行觀塘道要30分鐘先成事都好terrible......
老老實實觀塘道迴旋處塞到死喇,仲唔放d車上觀繞就認真terrible喇......

Are you sure? Tons of people are already arguing that there are rooms for cutting the frequency of Tseung Kwan O routes, and what I experience from the reality is bus routes in Kwun Tong are much more in need than Tseung Kwan O. But you have presupposition on Kwun Tong Routes and neglect the tough operation in bus routes in Kwun Tong, then what can we discuss?

Are you sure?
呢度得幾個人覺得咁諗咋...
剩係識係將軍澳抽水,就黎抽到將軍澳冇巴士行喇!!!

你睇下224M/28A(下繁)載空氣先再講啦...

Have you just stayed in TKO for your whole life and didnt have a chance to go to Kwun Tong to take a look?
I dont think you will say the same thing if you go to Kwun Tong and see how chaotic and inadequate Kwun Tong bus services is, Mr. GK9141.

same reply:你睇下224M/28A(下繁)載空氣先再講啦...

Oh I finally know who makes Ms Fong giving such ignorant suggestion like extending 98S and 796X to LOHAS Park and start the operation of 98D Speical service from LOHAS Park, which is totally a waste of resources. Would you feel ashame of doing so?

真係唔好玩,康城車可以由廠果度出車,就算唔係康城特車都要私牌去坑口開工
如果九巴唔用廠車既話咁係九巴自己浪費資源..

仲有,你有冇讀過Geog.?
developed area根本就唔再需要加資源,就好似美國咁自己搞得掂
developing area就好似非洲咁樣,需要人地協助
咁又係既,將軍澳既康城仲develop緊(即係ing啦),巴士資源係有一定既需要架!!

btw,我講「左右大局」既theme:幾廿年前觀塘議員左右大局搞到九巴版將沙開唔成,你就講Ms Fong幫Lohas park做乜!?九唔搭八...

Different bus companies have different perspective, and also their willingness in taking risk is different. I dont think this can show that XXX company is more aggressive or so, or even worth to discuss...

risk different?
你見唔見到你既同路人係《沙田巴士服務不足》果個post講到74X就算頂閘都要入鑽鐵而唔開特車?
咁係咪九巴太過怕risk呀?

798同九巴版將沙一樣道理/42C拆線方案亦係一樣道理
事實上亦證明新巴係進取過九巴好多倍
呢個亦係正正video既其中一個pt,請你正視九巴服務質素....
唔係一句「 Different bus companies have different perspective 」就可以推卸左你之前講d謬論

Well why dont I take the alternative transport system instead? Perhaps I would be in most than a half of the trip in that 30 mins already. I know you have plenty of time to enjoy waiting for another bus, but sorry we dont.

你唔會關我乜事?
我寧願用30分鐘行下銅記Sogo/時代之後上車都好過即刻上車之後30分鐘係度牛河...

Well again, dont put the blame on others. This only shows you are arrogant, injustice and immoral.

講到immoral邊夠某d人係咁河蟹人地資源咁勁呀!?

If you say this to those living in Hong Kong Island I am afraid they will get fainted. and actually I dont think 796X is really that so-called "優質"...

唔好意思
我呢個post只係比較九巴同新巴(前面已提及比較798同九巴版將沙),
當然你可以比較城巴,但係離題者後果自負
sorry,我只係講新巴整體上係優質,並唔代表796X係優質

我用第2 d 野比唔係有問題呀嘛?
你一個人唔可以定哂成個遊戲規則嫁lo

Hin.307:
九巴揾你笨 ?
人地點揾你笨 ?
價錢唔合理嗎 ?
但我都唔見得新巴個價錢做得好好

你:
296A 同 796S 一比, 796S 一下比人KO啦..
好既你唔拎黎比..近既你唔拎黎比?
你係要拎98A比?
你憎老九姐~ !!
就算係咁比 98A多車好多.
98D多車好多不突只仲快好多..
同埋我唔好拎 681 VS 962 收費比?
3D VS 15A 比?
89系VS 798比.. 798咁少車點做線王係重點
96R VS 698R比?! 點解698R咁少車.. 噢~ 秒殺!!
你咁比咩都比你嬴哂!!

93A,93K,297等......
觀塘亦都冇excess車俾你去用

重點係我地當日唔比你CUT..你唔會有今日798..~

線王一定要快?!
89D仲爆過74X囉講真~
入黃泥頭係歷史問題~
89X根本服務重點唔係沙市..之前已講~
愉翠苑上咪快~
對比新巴條970X都唔係快架..係香港仔~
再離譜仲有N8X..正頭假X線.~~

Well the point is there are plenty of flaws and contradiction in your argument, then how can you counter-argue others' argument?

Well, you have such injustice presupposition on my argument I am not interested to discuss any thing with such an arrogant person anymore.

Then you should think of ways to solve or improve the chaos in Kwun Tong Road Roundabout. Avoiding problem by putting tons of routes to Kwun Tong Bypass is only 斬腳趾避沙蟲...

Really? Maybe you only indulge in your own TKO-is-the-king dream and neglect the majority. I really feel pity for you.

Are you sure 224M and 28A didnt take any passengers in the evening rush-hour? Have you traced all the frequency?

Well as I remember 98D Special Frequency is not privately departed from TKO Depot, but Hang Hau N instead.
That means the bus has to go to Hang Hau N from Depot and then go back to LOHAS Park again.
Wouldnt it be a waste of energy?
Also, you save the time and energy travelling from Depot to the destination, which is only 2 trips I guess, but from the new destination to old destination, the extra journey is more than 10 or more times when compare with that 2 trips. If the new destination has plenty of potential passengers, I agree it is worth, but it is not the case in LOHAS Park, I am sorry to say so.

Sorry, it is the other way round. Developed area in fact need more resources. You can easily brainstorm some example like electricity and water. Well this is OT anyway.

Wont be Ms Fong grabbing bus routes for Lohas Park called 左右大局? According to what I heard from other TKO residents, it does. But as far you insist TKO resident have the right to dispossess excessive resources and devilize Kwun Tong residents, there is no room for discussion.

Your so-called immorality approach is proved to be invalid and unrealistic for tons of times. It is so tired for me to repeat this again and again and I am not going to do it anymore...

Sorry what I want to raise is exactly the NWFB SERVICE IN HONG KONG ISLAND. I didnt mention anything about Citybus, dont try to gamble others words all the time. It is very annoying.

[字海無視]

老實講，如果今日觀塘有條線好似66咁虧，班班得一兩個人，你叫九記cut果條線既資源黎開新線既話，佢一定死都應承你，因為有籍口可以cut條蝕本線既車。但係而家講緊既係80系同89系呢兩個經常頂閘既線系，你真係覺得老九會risk cut一條勁賺既線既車黎開一條唔知多唔多客既新線？

而家唔係道唔道德既問題，而係實際上博唔過，還死掂死比新記食左佢好過。

GK9141@93A :

一開始比新巴入主將軍澳已經係錯誤
(先唔好理九巴冇投標同埋而家佢服務質素係點)

老老實實,
當初新巴入主將軍澳,我都覺得運吉多此一舉
(因為會出現路線重疊,如296a+796s,仲會出現本區未能直接運輸情況,如翠林>調景嶺)
因此亦都出現「保九抗新」既行為
但後來番心諗諗,新巴入主根本就係一件好事
你諗下點解296ACD會係將軍澳區九巴最重視既一堆路線啦?
將北主要同龜鐵鬥,
將南除左要同(較將北快)既龜鐵鬥之外,仲有一堆新巴路線呀...
296A仲好d,因為有bbi王道
296C同796C鬥到白熱化..
296D同796X/P鬥,當然你可以講796X比較弱,但始終796P係一個威脅
如果唔係有新巴,
我諗你條296A一定入左調景嶺好耐,到時尚德客又唔gur架啦
296C/796C只係保留其中一條,到時係將南又係遊花園
296X(前796X)+296D仲好d,但你都咪洗諗住296X入到尖咀...

成日話,有競爭先有進步,
我舉個例子,98D同296D,
係08年6月8號之前,98D同296D都係收緊$8.2
但係九巴加價既時候,98D就加到$8.6,296D就冇加到,維持收緊$8.2..
你覺得係乜野原因造成呢?
仲有98C,296C,796C比較下價錢,你又覺得點解98C可以足足貴將南兩條線成兩蚊?

當諗到呢d野,就算唔講服務質素
你都會同我一樣咁樣覺得:由抗拒新巴變成鐘意新巴...

GK9141@93A :

我廢事又被人暗算「離題神功」收警告啦
同798/新巴(包括新巴vs九巴)冇關既野我儘量講少d

咁你覺得自己係咪冇問題? 唔洗負責任?!
唔好將自己都有錯既地方推落埋人地度~

GK9141@93A :

我用第2 d 野比唔係有問題呀嘛?
你一個人唔可以定哂成個遊戲規則嫁lo

唔好意思,我睇返兩篇文好多次...

Hin.307:
九巴揾你笨 ?
人地點揾你笨 ?
價錢唔合理嗎 ?
但我都唔見得新巴個價錢做得好好

你:
296A 同 796S 一比, 796S 一下比人KO啦..
好既你唔拎黎比..近既你唔拎黎比?
你係要拎98A比?
你憎老九姐~ !!
就算係咁比 98A多車好多.
98D多車好多不突只仲快好多..
同埋我唔好拎 681 VS 962 收費比?
3D VS 15A 比?
89系VS 798比.. 798咁少車點做線王係重點
96R VS 698R比?! 點解698R咁少車.. 噢~ 秒殺!!
你咁比咩都比你嬴哂!!

人地Hin.307好明確咁指出用價錢做比較,
你又冇講296A同796S比乜野,當然apply前面人地定左既規則啦(因為你都冇講新既比較方法...),咁樣296A同796S比較點解唔係打和先?必答題~
你平時都係咁..人講東你講西..
就當我冇講..咁而家你想點?!
只須3字ans: BBI

93A,93K,297等......
觀塘亦都冇excess車俾你去用

224M,28A,15A等....
將軍澳亦都冇excess車俾你去用
咁我比你..你係咪拎93A,93K,297車出黎?

重點係我地當日唔比你CUT..你唔會有今日798..~

重點係話事權係新巴果度
唔知邊個講車源係巴士公司架呢?
乜開線cut線新巴可以話哂事?
咁我諗你條將荃唔洗討論一早有得開la~
條797M一早cut得la

線王一定要快?!
89D仲爆過74X囉講真~
入黃泥頭係歷史問題~
89X根本服務重點唔係沙市..之前已講~
愉翠苑上咪快~
對比新巴條970X都唔係快架..係香港仔~
再離譜仲有N8X..正頭假X線.~~

]我冇話線王一定要快,
但係根據上面討論,線王有兩個extreme位,一係就快到七彩,一係就流水到七彩(1A)
89算什麼?
同樣我都冇講到970X同N8X係線王...
老老實實我冇講到X線一定係線王喎...我只係point outX線唔一定特快..
我想回你呢句:
89X?X線根本就唔快,係第一城停燈停到噴血, (你指明九巴個X係呃人..我舉例新城都有)
九龍方向,如果一齊有車,真係分分鐘798跑左大半條觀繞既時候89X先岩岩上大老山隧道咋


同埋你呢句..唉慢車點做得到線王呀...已暗示要快d先做到線王
同藍字你所講既意思完全唔同?! 是咪係講哂了?
其實74X兜四美..鑽石山一樣唔係快到7彩.. 6C一樣唔係流水到七彩..
但佢地都係線王


重點係線王再在於快慢..
快不一定就是線王
慢不一定就是頹線.
定線如何受人歡迎+服務最多人是重點.

【注意】#7465　#§※寂寞之子※§
p2175559.htm#p2175559
"

【論壇通用規則】
9.5 除回覆未曾回覆的文章外，不得於 48 小時內回覆最後回覆者為自己的文章
違例者最高處分：每篇違規文章凍結戶口 20 天

"
感謝　閣下在本論壇發表文章，唯請留意以上規則，謝謝合作！

CNR4806 :[字海無視]

老實講，如果今日觀塘有條線好似66咁虧，班班得一兩個人，你叫九記cut果條線既資源黎開新線既話，佢一定死都應承你，因為有籍口可以cut條蝕本線既車。但係而家講緊既係80系同89系呢兩個經常頂閘既線系，你真係覺得老九會risk cut一條勁賺既線既車黎開一條唔知多唔多客既新線？

而家唔係道唔道德既問題，而係實際上博唔過，還死掂死比新記食左佢好過。