GK9141@93A :Well the point is there are plenty of flaws and contradiction in your argument, then how can you counter-argue others' argument?
Well, you have such injustice presupposition on my argument I am not interested to discuss any thing with such an arrogant person anymore.
如果你覺得係有contradiction既話,即係仲未理解到「頂閘」同「班次」無關啦...
咁恕小弟未能幫到你啦,由你繼續認為係矛盾啦,不過遲d出街俾人話「點解20分鐘一班既車頂閘冇得加班,一定係3分鐘一班既車頂閘先有得加班」既時候你千祁唔好認為20=3喎
Do you understand what I have said? You didnt digest what I have said and saying something irrelavant to my argument. You sidetrack too much and make others very hard to discuss with you.
Then you should think of ways to solve or improve the chaos in Kwun Tong Road Roundabout. Avoiding problem by putting tons of routes to Kwun Tong Bypass is only 斬腳趾避沙蟲...
斬腳趾避沙蟲都好丫
好過冇解決到個問題
If you think 斬腳趾避沙蟲 is a good solution, then go ahead. And, no matter it is 斬腳趾避沙蟲 or what , it is still very reasonable for Kwun Tong District to discuss the routes passing through the road in Kwun Tong District. The reason is very simple: that route is using resources in Kwun Tong District (you know road is also one kind of resources).
Really? Maybe you only indulge in your own TKO-is-the-king dream and neglect the majority. I really feel pity for you.
定係你dream觀塘過頭呀,成日係度抽油抽水
If you still insist others giving argument as 抽油抽水, it show that you are no longer rational and it is not worthwhile to discuss with you anymore.
Are you sure 224M and 28A didnt take any passengers in the evening rush-hour? Have you traced all the frequency?
如果我話客量同將軍澳過海三寶差唔多既時候咁你有乜回應?
so? 224M and 28A only take 6 schedule buses, but how about TKO Cross-Harbour Series?
Well as I remember 98D Special Frequency is not privately departed from TKO Depot, but Hang Hau N instead.
That means the bus has to go to Hang Hau N from Depot and then go back to LOHAS Park again.
Wouldnt it be a waste of energy?
Also, you save the time and energy travelling from Depot to the destination, which is only 2 trips I guess, but from the new destination to old destination, the extra journey is more than 10 or more times when compare with that 2 trips. If the new destination has plenty of potential passengers, I agree it is worth, but it is not the case in LOHAS Park, I am sorry to say so.
咁呢個係九巴問題啦
佢要棄近圖遠,佢要浪費資源係佢既事...
明明有得車廠即出,佢要浪費油錢咪有得佢浪費囉,呢家又唔係方議員建議佢咁浪費法既...
I am taking about the waste of energy in serving area that doesnt need such much resources, what does it relate to whether the depot is close to that area or not... Hoi Lai Estate is very close to LCK Depot as well, does it mean Hoi Lai Estate can have tons of routes? Be rational please.
Sorry, it is the other way round. Developed area in fact need more resources. You can easily brainstorm some example like electricity and water. Well this is OT anyway.
當真!?
日本只係地震既時候先要人道救援物資
但係非洲有好多國家要常規救援物資喎
邊個拎得多d?
Oh you treat TKO as an area of needing rescue aids. That's really hilarious, but I love it
I think your perception is really narrow. Many developed cities and countries also imported lots of resources from outside. Examples have been given previously, I am not going to repeat for someone having narrow insight and only foucs on his own area.
Wont be Ms Fong grabbing bus routes for Lohas Park called 左右大局? According to what I heard from other TKO residents, it does. But as far you insist TKO resident have the right to dispossess excessive resources and devilize Kwun Tong residents, there is no room for discussion.
康城呢,原本就冇巴士線出到九龍
咁呢家有班人住左係度,要有常規車出去都好正常姐
康城更有需要過其他區啦,冇車喎!
觀塘區少架車去荃灣都係度嘈吵,咁康城冇巴士係咪要殺人?
Oh, really? Then there should be a long long queue in front of 796X series and 98D Special Frequency, but is it the case? I doubt.
Your so-called immorality approach is proved to be invalid and unrealistic for tons of times. It is so tired for me to repeat this again and again and I am not going to do it anymore...
唉就係我講完之後d人都唔加以消化同理會,所以我先要講多幾次之嘛
You better ask yourself if you did the same thing beforehand before criticizing others
Sorry what I want to raise is exactly the NWFB SERVICE IN HONG KONG ISLAND. I didnt mention anything about Citybus, dont try to gamble others words all the time. It is very annoying.
咁點解唔可以討論九龍區既新巴路線呢?
講真港島區既線好難同九巴比喎
你唔好同我講用38比38呀?用42比42呀?用42C比42C呀?
三組都係觀塘區<->葵青區vs東區<->南區既路線,
打個比喻:邊樣多d?1KGvs$1000
唔同性質既野根本就比較唔到,就好似上面果幾組vs咁樣
but the point is NWFB did have some poor service in other area so what you said "luckily HK still have NWFB this company" is already invalid. Well, if you say "luckily TKO, or even Tiu Keng Leng, still have NWFB this company", then it may be more sensible.
![[flowerface]](https://hkbf.org/images/smilies/flower.gif "丁香丹桂茉莉 都覺得可愛")
。93A熱豪跟隨692永久停駛。 
![[sosad]](https://hkbf.org/images/smilies/icon_sosad.gif "So Sad"){kind=icon}
![[banghead]](https://hkbf.org/images/smilies/icon_banghead.gif "我撞牆死左佢算啦！"){kind=icon}
![[bomb]](https://hkbf.org/images/smilies/Bomb.gif "Bomb")
... For fare, are you sure? how do you define same type of transportation? does minibus and tram count in? in some case, minibus has a higher fare of KMB, and on the other hand, NWFB fare is higher than that of tram. Well, if you say minibus and tram are not same type of transport with buses, then I really dont know what you mean by same type of transport. 
【注意】#18371 #GK9141@93A
: 