講到尾, 你係唔係想拆左條西鐵? 如果唔係, 你又想做乜呢? 用輕鐡行西鐵?
其實西鐵都曾經加班, 可見並無乘客量不足的問題, 就算乘客量低, 都無以前嘅沙頭角支線咁低掛

冇左全月通,西鐵轉輕鐵由唔洗錢(唔知有冇記錯)到唔洗錢10個站? 再變到要俾錢搭輕鐵,搭西鐵D人仲會更少.......

係出現左全月通,人先多,不過由$400加到$5XX 都叫做平過巴士,先多人搭

K16.NF6585 :

miklcct :鐵路嚟講我知道嘅輕鐵電車無時無刻都咁多人，得西鐵線同東涌線係咁少人（我唔知昂坪360、山頂纜車、迪士尼線同主題公園鐵路嘅情況）

我絕對相信平日下晝 2 點半既輕鐵都唔會點多人法 (761P 除外)

不如你搭一單先講啦。我次次搭505都勁多人。

miklcct :不如你搭一單先講啦。我次次搭505都勁多人。

我次次搭615P都冇乜人。

miklcct :鐵路嚟講我知道嘅輕鐵電車無時無刻都咁多人，得西鐵線同東涌線係咁少人（我唔知昂坪360、山頂纜車、迪士尼線同主題公園鐵路嘅情況）

你無知

完。

JU2541．FD5520 :

miklcct :鐵路嚟講我知道嘅輕鐵電車無時無刻都咁多人，得西鐵線同東涌線係咁少人（我唔知昂坪360、山頂纜車、迪士尼線同主題公園鐵路嘅情況）

你無知

完。

巨準試下星期六十點到十二時間坐荃灣線過海
完。
其實你知唔知咩叫大白象工程?
係禁講是咪肥彭唔應該起機場,西鐵?

miklcct :我覺得西鐵做唔到好似荃灣線、港島線咁多人咪就係起得唔好囉，即係大白象囉。不如等我舉吓荃灣線同西鐵線有咩分別，令荃灣線咁多人搭囉：

1 荃灣線絕大部分車站都喺市區入面（只係荔景同美孚衰少少）；西鐵線得屯門、柯士甸、尖東同紅磡叫做喺市區，其它地方全部要駁腳。
2 荃灣線定線直接，由荃灣出市區同公路平排；西鐵線定線迂迴，由屯門出市區要經元朗，只係因為速度快先追到260X出尖沙咀。一邊駁腳都重得，兩邊都要駁，就同巴士無得鬥。

東涌線重衰，除咗東涌同香港，個個站都喺市區邊緣，雖則佢唔算迂迴。但東涌加青衣人口又點同屯元天比呀？東涌線少人搭係因為人口少，西鐵線少人搭係因為定線差。

1. Explain the "emptiness" of the West Rail Line and compare it with the "emptiness" of the Island Line during the same business-hour but not rush-hour (1 mark)
2. Explain the "emptiness" of the West Rail Line and compare it with the "emptiness" of No.23 buses and No.970 buses during the same business-hour but not rush-hour (1 mark)

MB720 :
1. Explain the "emptiness" of the West Rail Line and compare it with the "emptiness" of the Island Line during the same business-hour but not rush-hour (1 mark)
2. Explain the "emptiness" of the West Rail Line and compare it with the "emptiness" of No.23 buses and No.970 buses during the same business-hour but not rush-hour (1 mark)

1. West Rail Line is mostly empty during the day since most passengers prefer using buses in the area served by the West Rail Line, which are faster and more direct. Island Line is mostly full during the day since it is very convenient within the city centre, and the traffic congestion suffered by buses and trams is very serious, so most passengers prefer taking the reliable Island Line.

2. West Rail Line is mostly empty during the day since its competitors, i.e. franchised buses, offer faster, more direct and more convenient services. No. 970 buses are mostly full during the day since there are no direct competitors in the Southern District, and it goes through busy areas including Mong Kok, Jordan, Sai Ying Pun and the University of Hong Kong. Moreover, due to the congestion of Nathan Road, the service of No. 970 and 970X is unreliable, usually falls short of the information stated at the bus stops, which makes the buses appear fuller than they should.

下晝2點幾呢d 時間
TKL , ISL , KTL 都係咁上下客量bo. 準巨
最多都係有幾個人企下咁

呀..乜西鐵而家蝕好多咩?
定有人唔甘心堆心愛既巴士線比西鐵搶客搞到CUT線CUT班係到搵野黎講

heihei107 :如果午夜12點都有咁多人既話 不論係港島線 荃灣線 東鐵西鐵 都幾得人驚 我建議你快d落車

[gag]見到咁多人係因為佢屬於另一個世界[/gag]

正題：根據維基資料，載滿一列西鐵線列車需要3,120人，而坐滿則需要344人。

我需要得知樓主如何能在此時間(2:30P.M.)找到3,120人有空閒伴你遊走西鐵線同一區間呢？

八卦一問：若「何時是非繁忙時間」這種香港人常識也不知道或不懂得辨認，我想問一問樓主是否成年香港人，還是只是挂名来港抢资源的「香港人」？

如是後者，我勸你回去高呼：五毛打手万岁

miklcct :

MB720 :
1. Explain the "emptiness" of the West Rail Line and compare it with the "emptiness" of the Island Line during the same business-hour but not rush-hour (1 mark)
2. Explain the "emptiness" of the West Rail Line and compare it with the "emptiness" of No.23 buses and No.970 buses during the same business-hour but not rush-hour (1 mark)

1. West Rail Line is mostly empty during the day since most passengers prefer using buses in the area served by the West Rail Line, which are faster and more direct. Island Line is mostly full during the day since it is very convenient within the city centre, and the traffic congestion suffered by buses and trams is very serious, so most passengers prefer taking the reliable Island Line.

2. West Rail Line is mostly empty during the day since its competitors, i.e. franchised buses, offer faster, more direct and more convenient services. No. 970 buses are mostly full during the day since there are no direct competitors in the Southern District, and it goes through busy areas including Mong Kok, Jordan, Sai Ying Pun and the University of Hong Kong. Moreover, due to the congestion of Nathan Road, the service of No. 970 and 970X is unreliable, usually falls short of the information stated at the bus stops, which makes the buses appear fuller than they should.

知唔知乜叫 "mostly empty" ?
又知唔知起基建 or 做生意唔可以單一去睇? 係睇賺 or 蝕之餘... 呢條線係 contribute 左幾多
有冇協同效應

定係你想曲線將 970* 棒高?

AAU21 :講到尾, 你係唔係想拆左條西鐵? 如果唔係, 你又想做乜呢? 用輕鐡行西鐵?
其實西鐵都曾經加班, 可見並無乘客量不足的問題, 就算乘客量低, 都無以前嘅沙頭角支線咁低掛

其實唔駛講咁耐歷史，而家近近地有條叫機場快線嘅物體，應該除咗朝早一段時間之外，其餘時間半車空氣…

如果西鐵好似東鐵咁起，大部分車站喺正市中心，咪唔會咁少人搭囉。又或者好似當年改荔景站咁將美孚站改做對面轉車（技術唔得咪改過另一個囉，或者上下層轉車都得喇啩，行成5分鐘先轉到車，巴士都飛咗5公里啦），咁吸引力咪大增囉。

東鐵除咗邊境車站、太和站、大學站、馬場站、火炭站同九龍塘站之外，個個車站都幾乎喺正市中心；西鐵只有屯門站、朗屏站（好勉強）同九龍南線三個車站喺市中心，多人極有限。

機場快線衰係收太貴。如果減價至東涌站嘅兩倍，相信會有大量搭開A車的遊客改搭機鐵。

miklcct :如果西鐵好似東鐵咁起，大部分車站喺正市中心，咪唔會咁少人搭囉。又或者好似當年改荔景站咁將美孚站改做對面轉車（技術唔得咪改過另一個囉，或者上下層轉車都得喇啩，行成5分鐘先轉到車，巴士都飛咗5公里啦），咁吸引力咪大增囉。

東鐵除咗邊境車站、太和站、馬場站、火炭站同九龍塘站之外，個個車站都幾乎喺正市中心；西鐵只有屯門站、朗屏站（好勉強）同九龍南線三個車站喺市中心，多人極有限。

機場快線衰係收太貴。如果減價至東涌站嘅兩倍，相信會有大量搭開A車的遊客改搭機鐵。

我想問2個問題

1.屯門,元朗,天水圍市中心正確位置係邊?
2.朗屏好勉強都可以叫做市中心?
3.就算俾你搵到正確市中心位置,唔一定有位置起係地面起高架橋?咁要改鑽地,但屯門,元朗,天水圍市中心係咪要避樓鑽地?好似有大量樓宇已經落成多年

最認同係你講機鐵收得太貴,平D都會多D人搭

eric2316 :

miklcct :如果西鐵好似東鐵咁起，大部分車站喺正市中心，咪唔會咁少人搭囉。又或者好似當年改荔景站咁將美孚站改做對面轉車（技術唔得咪改過另一個囉，或者上下層轉車都得喇啩，行成5分鐘先轉到車，巴士都飛咗5公里啦），咁吸引力咪大增囉。

東鐵除咗邊境車站、太和站、馬場站、火炭站同九龍塘站之外，個個車站都幾乎喺正市中心；西鐵只有屯門站、朗屏站（好勉強）同九龍南線三個車站喺市中心，多人極有限。

機場快線衰係收太貴。如果減價至東涌站嘅兩倍，相信會有大量搭開A車的遊客改搭機鐵。

我想問2個問題

1.屯門,元朗,天水圍市中心正確位置係邊?
2.朗屏好勉強都可以叫做市中心?
3.就算俾你搵到正確市中心位置,唔一定有位置起係地面起高架橋?咁要改鑽地,但屯門,元朗,天水圍市中心係咪要避樓鑽地?好似有大量樓宇已經落成多年

最認同係你講機鐵收得太貴,平D都會多D人搭

屯門市中心喺屯門站東南面，元朗市中心即係元朗大馬路（輕鐵豐年路站至大棠路站之間），天水圍市中心喺嘉湖銀座附近。朗屏站有條唔算太長嘅天橋可以去到元朗（西）巴總，嗰頭已經可以叫做市中心。

不如你諗下點解東鐵當年可以直插市中心啦。好簡單，西鐵提早25年起，同新市鎮、地鐵一齊起，就可以直插所有市中心。所以咪就係當年港英政府無能囉，諗住一條屯門公路，4條巴士線可以搞掂晒全個屯門元朗（我睇過文件，當年政府諗住全屯門用4條線出市區，當中一條良景，一條屯碼，兩條元朗開），結果4條線變成十幾條線，屯門公路日日塞囉，咪要起西鐵補鑊囉。好啦，搞得嚟全屯門元朗已經係高樓大廈啦，重點起？得嘅。沿河囉。咪即係今日嘅西鐵囉。