KR8155‧3349 :

miklcct :再加一條數碼港開經華富直達中環（將30X加經華富邨）20分鐘一班

又行番回頭路入番華富

用30X仲有一個弊處, 就係華富變相加價, 明明而家有條同普通線同價嘅特快線, 你無啦啦迫人坐貴車, 睬你都傻啦, 你估家陣幾毫子呀? $1.2一程呀大佬...

isar :點解一定要成個南區薄扶林往中西區既線陪葬?
970短線車就一定加硬，事關23A將取消，如無意外有車過970，加埋之前新巴19取消都有車分比970
之但係鐵路通車後970會減車

19 取消咗啲車都唔知加咗去邊
970 咪加得一班下繁蒲飛路特車咁大把...
非繁仲竟然諗縮數減班添

Talking with him is useless. He got 970 only in his eyes and nothing else.

Regarding the transportation method, actually more students are willing to take minivans or buses to Sheung Wan and Central first before riding MTR to the Kowloon side, as they got the common sense that it could be hard to get a seat during rush hour. Of course if you can't be bothered with changing transportation method, taxi suits you.

And by the end of next year, walk a few steps more to Haking Wong Building, which you can ride MTR to whatever places you like.

再 update 一下小小野先,
而家 TD 建議取消 113 線 ~
http://hk.news.yahoo.com/%E9%81%8B%E8%B ... 55095.html

S3N363~GA5311 :用30X仲有一個弊處, 就係華富變相加價, 明明而家有條同普通線同價嘅特快線, 你無啦啦迫人坐貴車, 睬你都傻啦, 你估家陣幾毫子呀? $1.2一程呀大佬...

$6.5 搭慢車
比多幾毫可以出埋 CWB

MB720 :Regarding the transportation method, actually more students are willing to take minivans or buses to Sheung Wan and Central first before riding MTR to the Kowloon side, as they got the common sense that it could be hard to get a seat during rush hour. Of course if you can't be bothered with changing transportation method, taxi suits you.

In reality, most of the student of HKU would travel to Kowloon Peninsula by taking NWFB route 970 / 970X during rush hour, it is more directly.
Despite the staggering demand of HKU students, it does not indicate that we should allocate more bus from other routes of South District in order to strengthen the service of NWFB route 970 / 970X.
It is really unfair to do so

AVD1 :再 update 一下小小野先,
而家 TD 建議取消 113 線 ~
http://hk.news.yahoo.com/%E9%81%8B%E8%B ... 55095.html

中西區既文件：
頭兩份係畫番條新鐵路出嚟
http://www.districtcouncils.gov.hk/cent ... AnnexI.pdf
http://www.districtcouncils.gov.hk/cent ... nnexII.pdf
跟住係建議路線更改
http://www.districtcouncils.gov.hk/cent ... nexIII.pdf
http://www.districtcouncils.gov.hk/cent ... awings.pdf

兩份文件夾埋，最意想不到既係竟然係殺 40 同 18，反而 40M 同 2 有得留低

HF3204 :中西區既文件：
頭兩份係畫番條新鐵路出嚟
http://www.districtcouncils.gov.hk/cent ... AnnexI.pdf
http://www.districtcouncils.gov.hk/cent ... nnexII.pdf
跟住係建議路線更改
http://www.districtcouncils.gov.hk/cent ... nexIII.pdf
http://www.districtcouncils.gov.hk/cent ... awings.pdf

兩份文件夾埋，最意想不到既係竟然係殺 40 同 18，反而 40M 同 2 有得留低

18 cut 係意料中事

KR8155‧3349 :18 cut 係意料中事

點解?
18 盤數點睇都好過 2 啦係話?

HF3204 :

KR8155‧3349 :18 cut 係意料中事

點解?
18 盤數點睇都好過 2 啦係話?

而家2搞搞下自己都獨市位時,
斬左條2係麻煩左...

唔好忘記筲箕灣總站果邊早繁遲下得條85A...

但咁講並唔代表我支持取消18...

HF3204 :

AVD1 :再 update 一下小小野先,
而家 TD 建議取消 113 線 ~
http://hk.news.yahoo.com/%E9%81%8B%E8%B ... 55095.html

中西區既文件：
頭兩份係畫番條新鐵路出嚟
http://www.districtcouncils.gov.hk/cent ... AnnexI.pdf
http://www.districtcouncils.gov.hk/cent ... nnexII.pdf
跟住係建議路線更改
http://www.districtcouncils.gov.hk/cent ... nexIII.pdf
http://www.districtcouncils.gov.hk/cent ... awings.pdf

兩份文件夾埋，最意想不到既係竟然係殺 40 同 18，反而 40M 同 2 有得留低

見到佢郁 104,
好心佢搞得 104 就唔差在搞埋 905 啦

KR8155‧3349 :In reality, most of the student of HKU would travel to Kowloon Peninsula by taking NWFB route 970 / 970X during rush hour, it is more directly.
Despite the staggering demand of HKU students, it does not indicate that we should allocate more bus from other routes of South District in order to strengthen the service of NWFB route 970 / 970X.
It is really unfair to do so

It should be better for you to have a look at this station...

https://maps.google.com.hk/maps?hl=zh-T ... 88,,0,8.56

...during afternoon, especially starting from 4pm, and observe what the crowd would ride when they arrive Admiralty, after riding Route 23 bus or Minivan.

It is quite unfair to request people who lives Western and Southern District to cut their transportation to their home which is a necessity just because a bunch of HKU students refuse to change their transportation method.

CMB銀豪 :城巴會肯cut 629？？

如果而家cut，可以叫光榮結業，將運載乘客進入海洋公園嘅責任交予南港島線。
到時俾鐵路打到趴喺度先走，巴士公司面都無…

The only factor which should affect the frequency of bus routes is the demand. If the demand is extremely high, 1-minute headway is even possible, if the demand is very low, the result may be only one departure per day. It is very clear that the demand for crossing the harbour is much greater than the demand to Central at afternoon peak hour, therefore, the number of buses to Central should be reduced, and the number of buses on cross-harbour routes should be increased. In reality, no buses from Pokfulam to Central skip stops due to their fullness, however, many buses skip stops before crossing the harbour because they are completely packed and cannot accommodate more passengers.

I predict that even after the opening of the West Island Line, the demand of routes 970/970X will still be very high because it is still the most direct way to Kowloon and the New Territories, and even for changing to the East Rail Line at Mong Kok. It will require multiple transfers if I take the MTR directly from HKU which takes much time, but only a 10-minute walk if I take the bus and transfer at Mong Kok. However, the passengers currently transferring to West Rail Line will disappear.

It is unfair for us to change to a slower method just because the cross-harbour service is insufficient. (If we take 970X and then 960, we can arrive Tuen Mun from HKU in half an hour!) The southbound buses to Pokfulam from Sai Ying Pun are never fully-packed to the extent of the 970 buses, therefore, we should reduce the number of those buses to make some to be available for clearing accumulated cross-harbour passengers from Sai Ying Pun. The number of southbound Pokfulam buses should be reduced until every bus is 100% packed, which is the current situation of peak-hour 904, 905, 970, 970X, 971 and 973 buses.

Buses going home are a necessity, but buses for leaving school/work are a necessity too.

miklcct :The only factor which should affect the frequency of bus routes is the demand. If the demand is extremely high, 1-minute headway is even possible, if the demand is very low, the result may be only one departure per day. It is very clear that the demand for crossing the harbour is much greater than the demand to Central at afternoon peak hour, therefore, the number of buses to Central should be reduced, and the number of buses on cross-harbour routes should be increased. In reality, no buses from Pokfulam to Central skip stops due to their fullness, however, many buses skip stops before crossing the harbour because they are completely packed and cannot accommodate more passengers.

I predict that even after the opening of the West Island Line, the demand of routes 970/970X will still be very high because it is still the most direct way to Kowloon and the New Territories, and even for changing to the East Rail Line at Mong Kok. It will require multiple transfers if I take the MTR directly from HKU which takes much time, but only a 10-minute walk if I take the bus and transfer at Mong Kok. However, the passengers currently transferring to West Rail Line will disappear.

It is unfair for us to change to a slower method just because the cross-harbour service is insufficient. (If we take 970X and then 960, we can arrive Tuen Mun from HKU in half an hour!) The southbound buses to Pokfulam from Sai Ying Pun are never fully-packed to the extent of the 970 buses, therefore, we should reduce the number of those buses to make some to be available for clearing accumulated cross-harbour passengers from Sai Ying Pun. The number of southbound Pokfulam buses should be reduced until every bus is 100% packed, which is the current situation of peak-hour 904, 905, 970, 970X, 971 and 973 buses.

Buses going home are a necessity, but buses for leaving school/work are a necessity too.

970/X都未去到every bus 100%
就算根據以前RDP 970X頂多都係去到96%，971只有88%
要100%根本係天荒夜譚

ATR25 :

CMB銀豪 :城巴會肯cut 629？？

如果而家cut，可以叫光榮結業，將運載乘客進入海洋公園嘅責任交予南港島線。
到時俾鐵路打到趴喺度先走，巴士公司面都無…

咁到時南港島線一定飽和，故障嘅話何來梳散呢啲乘客嘅巴士線？最尾嘲笑運吉咪係一啲有建設性既巴迷？
擠滿唒人，乘客唔好受㗎

一句講唒，要維持現在既服務模式
服務密一啲啲
同埋將依家私家車税（唔計的士，客貨車）高啲啲

因為香港有好多私家車，好唔環保啊~